Descriptor
| Field Tests | 2 |
| Testing Programs | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Educational Policy | 1 |
| Educational Practices | 1 |
| Educational Trends | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Guides | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedChristie, Samuel G.; Casey, John A. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
One of the major concerns of the California school district represented in this case study centered on the possible legal problems associated with minimum competency testing (MCT). The responses of the district to the California law regarding MCT, and to six potential problem areas, are documented. (LC)
Descriptors: Accountability, Case Studies, Court Litigation, Field Tests
Peer reviewedMehrens, William A.; And Others – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1993
The test security policies and practices of state departments of education were investigated in a survey responded to by 46 states for 1989-90. The most detailed test security procedures have been implemented when test stakes are highest. Complex procedures are only considered cost effective in large-scale programs. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Educational Policy, Educational Practices, Educational Trends
