Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 3 |
| Data Collection | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Articulation (Education) | 1 |
| College Choice | 1 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| US House of Representatives | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Higher Education Act 1965 | 1 |
| Higher Education Act Title IV | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textUS House of Representatives, 2017
This document records testimony from a hearing held to discuss higher education and transparency as Congress is working to reauthorize the Higher Education Act. Member statements were presented by: (1) Honorable Susan A. Rankin, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development; and (2) Honorable Brett Guthrie, Chairman,…
Descriptors: Student Empowerment, Decision Making, Higher Education, College Students
California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento. – 1986
A feasibility plan is presented for a California comprehensive student information study that would identify factors affecting students' progress through California's entire educational system. The feasibility plan identifies: (1) potential improvements, (2) the study design required to achieve them, (3) the cost of implementing the design,…
Descriptors: Articulation (Education), College Students, Data Collection, Databases
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Education and Labor. – 1982
Hearings on the charging of processing fees to low- and middle-income students who apply for federal student assistance under Title IV of the Higher Education Act are presented. Attention is focused on whether the Department of Education's decision to eliminate the "check-off" option from the forms provided by the major processors…
Descriptors: College Students, Compliance (Legal), Data Collection, Eligibility
