Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Correlation | 2 |
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Coping | 1 |
| Cultural Differences | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| Family Characteristics | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Measurement and Evaluation in… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Romania | 1 |
| Switzerland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKoran, Jennifer – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2016
Proactive preliminary minimum sample size determination can be useful for the early planning stages of a latent variable modeling study to set a realistic scope, long before the model and population are finalized. This study examined existing methods and proposed a new method for proactive preliminary minimum sample size determination.
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Sample Size, Models, Sampling
Rusu, Petruta P.; Hilpert, Peter; Turliuc, Maria N.; Bodenmann, Guy – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2016
This study investigates the psychometric properties of the Romanian version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory with data from 510 married couples. The results confirm the theoretical factorial structure of the Dyadic Coping Inventory for both partners, indicating convergent validity, discriminate validity, and measurement invariance (across genders…
Descriptors: Coping, Psychometrics, Spouses, Factor Structure
