Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
Rizavi, Saba | 2 |
Foorman, Barbara R. | 1 |
Hariharan, Swaminathan | 1 |
Harmes, J. Christine | 1 |
Harris, Vincent | 1 |
Huynh, Huynh | 1 |
Kromrey, Jeffrey D. | 1 |
Lu, Ying | 1 |
Parshall, Cynthia G. | 1 |
Petscher, Yaacov | 1 |
Pitoniak, Mary | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 6 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Guides - General | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
California Achievement Tests | 2 |
Law School Admission Test | 1 |
Medical College Admission Test | 1 |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Foorman, Barbara R.; Petscher, Yaacov; Schatschneider, Chris – Florida Center for Reading Research, 2015
The FAIR-FS consists of computer-adaptive reading comprehension and oral language screening tasks that provide measures to track growth over time, as well as a Probability of Literacy Success (PLS) linked to grade-level performance (i.e., the 40th percentile) on the reading comprehension subtest of the Stanford Achievement Test (SAT-10) in the…
Descriptors: Reading Instruction, Screening Tests, Reading Comprehension, Oral Language
Rizavi, Saba; Hariharan, Swaminathan – Online Submission, 2001
The advantages that computer adaptive testing offers over linear tests have been well documented. The Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) design is more efficient than the Linear test design as fewer items are needed to estimate an examinee's proficiency to a desired level of precision. In the ideal situation, a CAT will result in examinees answering…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Test Construction, Test Length, Computer Assisted Testing
Parshall, Cynthia G.; Kromrey, Jeffrey D.; Harmes, J. Christine; Sentovich, Christina – 2001
Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) are efficient because of their optimal item selection procedures that target maximally informative items at each estimated ability level. However, operational administration of these optimal CATs results in a relatively small subset of items given to examinees too often, while another portion of the item pool is…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics)
Wang, Xiang-Bo; Harris, Vincent; Roussos, Louis – 2002
Multidimensionality is known to affect the accuracy of item parameter and ability estimations, which subsequently influences the computation of item characteristic curves (ICCs) and true scores. By judiciously combining sections of a Law School Admission Test (LSAT), 11 sections of varying degrees of uni- and multidimensional structures are used…
Descriptors: Ability, College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing, Estimation (Mathematics)
Rizavi, Saba; Way, Walter D.; Lu, Ying; Pitoniak, Mary; Steffen, Manfred – Online Submission, 2004
The purpose of this study was to use realistically simulated data to evaluate various CAT designs for use with the verbal reasoning measure of the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT). Factors such as item pool depth, content constraints, and item formats often cause repeated adaptive administrations of an item at ability levels that are not…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Bias, Item Banks, College Admission
Huynh, Huynh; Saunders, Joseph C. – 1980
A basic technical framework is provided for the design and use of mastery tests. The Mastery Testing Project (MTP) prepared this framework using advanced mathematics supplemented with computer simulation based on real test data collected by the South Carolina Statewide Testing Program. The MTP focused on basic technical issues encountered in using…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Annotated Bibliographies, Bayesian Statistics, Computer Assisted Testing