Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Dalton, Ben | 1 |
| Deatz, Richard | 1 |
| Hariharan, Swaminathan | 1 |
| Herget, Debbie | 1 |
| Johnston-Fisher, Jessica | 1 |
| Kinney, Saki | 1 |
| Rizavi, Saba | 1 |
| Rogers, Jim | 1 |
| Sinclair, Andrea | 1 |
| Smith, W. Zachary | 1 |
| Wilson, David | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| California Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Progress in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textHerget, Debbie; Dalton, Ben; Kinney, Saki; Smith, W. Zachary; Wilson, David; Rogers, Jim – National Center for Education Statistics, 2019
The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) is an international comparative study of student performance in reading literacy at the fourth grade. PIRLS 2016 marks the fourth iteration of the study, which has been conducted every 5 years since 2001. New to the PIRLS assessment in 2016, ePIRLS provides a computer-based extension to…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Grade 4, Reading Achievement, Foreign Countries
Sinclair, Andrea; Deatz, Richard; Johnston-Fisher, Jessica – Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, 2015
The overall purpose of the research studies described in this report was to investigate the quality of the administration of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) assessment during its first operational year (2014-2015). Findings from these studies can be used to identify threats to the validity of PARCC test…
Descriptors: Testing, Achievement Tests, Administrators, Readiness
Rizavi, Saba; Hariharan, Swaminathan – Online Submission, 2001
The advantages that computer adaptive testing offers over linear tests have been well documented. The Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) design is more efficient than the Linear test design as fewer items are needed to estimate an examinee's proficiency to a desired level of precision. In the ideal situation, a CAT will result in examinees answering…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Test Construction, Test Length, Computer Assisted Testing
