Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Algorithms | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Career Guidance | 1 |
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 1 |
| Enlisted Personnel | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Females | 1 |
| Job Analysis | 1 |
| Military Training | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Bowles, Ryan | 1 |
| Pommerich, Mary | 1 |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textBowles, Ryan; Pommerich, Mary – 2001
Many arguments have been made against allowing examinees to review and change their answers after completing a computer adaptive test (CAT). These arguments include: (1) increased bias; (2) decreased precision; and (3) susceptibility of test-taking strategies. Results of simulations suggest that the strength of these arguments is reduced or…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Review (Reexamination)
1979
In general, the 110 conference papers discuss the selection, training, and evaluation of enlisted personnel and officer personnel, as well as the use of job, task and soft skill analysis. More specific topics are: air traffic controllers; adaptive testing; criterion-referenced testing; performance testing; contingency management; management survey…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Career Guidance, Computer Assisted Testing, Criterion Referenced Tests
