Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Effect Size | 4 |
Sampling | 4 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Error of Measurement | 2 |
Sample Size | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Construct Validity | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Differences | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Barnette, J. Jackson | 1 |
Hinkle, Dennis E. | 1 |
Jaciw, Andrew P. | 1 |
Koran, Jennifer | 1 |
McLean, James E. | 1 |
Oliver, J. Dale | 1 |
Olsen, Robert B. | 1 |
Price, Cristofer | 1 |
Unlu, Fatih | 1 |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Koran, Jennifer – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2016
Proactive preliminary minimum sample size determination can be useful for the early planning stages of a latent variable modeling study to set a realistic scope, long before the model and population are finalized. This study examined existing methods and proposed a new method for proactive preliminary minimum sample size determination.
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Sample Size, Models, Sampling
Olsen, Robert B.; Unlu, Fatih; Price, Cristofer; Jaciw, Andrew P. – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2011
This report examines the differences in impact estimates and standard errors that arise when these are derived using state achievement tests only (as pre-tests and post-tests), study-administered tests only, or some combination of state- and study-administered tests. State tests may yield different evaluation results relative to a test that is…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Standardized Tests, State Standards, Reading Achievement
Barnette, J. Jackson; McLean, James E. – 2000
Eta-Squared (ES) is often used as a measure of strength of association of an effect, a measure often associated with effect size. It is also considered the proportion of total variance accounted for by an independent variable. It is simple to compute and interpret. However, it has one critical weakness cited by several authors (C. Huberty, 1994;…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Monte Carlo Methods, Sampling, Statistical Bias

Hinkle, Dennis E.; Oliver, J. Dale – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
In this paper, tables for the appropriate sample sizes are presented and discussed in the context that the determination of the effect size must precede the determination of the sample size. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Effect Size, Research Methodology, Research Needs, Research Problems