Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Elementary School Students | 3 |
Spatial Ability | 3 |
Active Learning | 2 |
Computation | 2 |
Computer Peripherals | 2 |
Educational Innovation | 2 |
Faculty Development | 2 |
Fellowships | 2 |
Fidelity | 2 |
Geometry | 2 |
Mathematics Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Douglas Gagnon | 2 |
Ela Joshi | 2 |
Eliese Rulifson | 2 |
Elise Levin-Güracar | 2 |
Nicole Arshan | 2 |
Tejaswini Tiruke | 2 |
Foorman, Barbara R. | 1 |
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Junior High Schools | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Douglas Gagnon; Ela Joshi; Nicole Arshan; Eliese Rulifson; Elise Levin-Güracar; Tejaswini Tiruke – Grantee Submission, 2023
The Mathematics, 3D Printing, and Computational Thinking Through Work-Based Learning (MPACT) program relies on teacher professional development, specialized curriculum and materials, and STEM industry mentors to provide grades 4-7 students with project-based experiences implemented across three learning modules. This technical report presents…
Descriptors: Mathematics Education, Computer Peripherals, Printing, Computation
Douglas Gagnon; Ela Joshi; Nicole Arshan; Eliese Rulifson; Elise Levin-Güracar; Tejaswini Tiruke – SRI Education, a Division of SRI International, 2023
The Mathematics, 3D Printing, and Computational Thinking Through Work-Based Learning (MPACT) program combines teacher professional development, specialized curriculum and materials and STEM industry mentors to provide grade 4-7 students with project-based experiences implemented across three learning modules. This technical report presents…
Descriptors: Mathematics Education, Computer Peripherals, Printing, Computation

Foorman, Barbara R.; And Others – Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1989
Examines Japanese and American children's styles of processing computerized geometric matrices. Hypothesizes cultural differences for response latencies. Finds no difference in accuracy between the two groups but significant differences in response times for second- and fifth-graders. (MW)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style, Computer Graphics