Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| China | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| India | 1 |
| Japan | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
| Taiwan | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| National Survey of Student… | 1 |
| Program for International… | 1 |
| Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textTeacher Education Accreditation Council, 2011
The Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) "Guide to Accreditation" includes a full description of TEAC's principles and standards, the accreditation process and audit, and detailed instruction on writing the "Brief." This revision includes expanded information on (1) preparing an "Inquiry Brief Proposal" and the audit of the "Inquiry…
Descriptors: Distance Education, Accreditation (Institutions), Glossaries, Federal Regulation
National Assessment Governing Board, 2007
The "Science Assessment and Item Specifications for the 2009 NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress)" (the "Specifications") translates the "Science Framework for the 2009 NAEP" (the "Framework") into guidelines for developing items and for developing the assessment as a whole. The primary purpose of the "Specifications" is to provide…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Science Tests, National Competency Tests, Position Papers
Atkinson, Robert D.; Mayo, Merrilea – Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2010
Is the United States getting it wrong when it comes to educating tomorrow's innovators in critical fields? It has been known for years that the only way to compete globally in information technology, engineering, nanotechnology, robotics and other fields is to give students the best educational opportunities possible. But do individuals have a…
Descriptors: Educational Opportunities, STEM Education, Educational Innovation, Economic Progress
