Descriptor
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Writing Improvement | 2 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Community Colleges | 1 |
| Editors | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Faculty Publishing | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Freshman Composition | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Studies in Higher Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNoble, Kenneth Allan – Studies in Higher Education, 1989
A survey of 23 scholarly journal editors in five countries concerning the qualities of acceptable and unacceptable articles is reported. Common problems, ways of improving manuscript quality, the role of the reviewer, and practical suggestions for aspiring authors are addressed. Emphasis is placed on getting published. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Attitudes, College Faculty, Editors, Faculty Publishing
Messina, Susan; White, Diane – 1992
In fall 1991, Solano Community College (California) undertook a study comparing the writing skills of students in an integrated course combining history and freshman English composition with students in unpaired history and English classes. Students were divided into three groups: the integrated class and two control groups, one taking history…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Educational Assessment, Freshman Composition, Integrated Activities
