Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Language Processing | 3 |
Eye Movements | 2 |
Motion | 2 |
Psycholinguistics | 2 |
Word Recognition | 2 |
Attention | 1 |
Auditory Perception | 1 |
Criticism | 1 |
Developmental Stages | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Group Discussion | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Do Curved Reaching Movements Emerge from Competing Perceptions? A Reply to van der Wel et al. (2009)
Spivey, Michael J.; Dale, Rick; Knoblich, Guenther; Grosjean, Marc – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
Spivey, Grosjean, and Knoblich (2005) reported smoothly curved reaching movements, via computer-mouse tracking, which suggested a continuously evolving flow of distributed lexical activation patterns into motor movement during a phonological competitor task. For example, when instructed to click the "candy," participants' mouse-cursor trajectories…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Language Research, Language Processing, Phonology
Van Der Wel, Robrecht P. R. D.; Eder, Jeffrey R.; Mitchel, Aaron D.; Walsh, Matthew M.; Rosenbaum, David A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009
M. J. Spivey, M. Grosjean, and G. Knoblich (2005) showed that in a phonological competitor task, participants' mouse cursor movements showed more curvature toward the competitor item when the competitor and target were phonologically similar than when the competitor and target were phonologically dissimilar. Spivey et al. interpreted this result…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Psychomotor Skills, Motion, Physics
Inhoff, Albrecht W.; Radach, Ralph; Eiter, Brianna – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
A. Pollatsek, E. D. Reichle, and K. Rayner argue that the critical findings in A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach are in general agreement with core assumptions of sequential attention shift models if additional assumptions and facts are considered. The current authors critically discuss the hypothesized time line of processing and indicate…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Word Recognition, Verbal Stimuli, Neurolinguistics