Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Reaction Time | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Experimental Psychology | 2 |
Word Recognition | 2 |
Attention | 1 |
Color | 1 |
Context Clues | 1 |
Dimensional Preference | 1 |
Eye Fixations | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Oral Reading | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Anderson, John R. | 1 |
Byrne, Michael D. | 1 |
Cho, Yang Seok | 1 |
Lien, Mei-Ching | 1 |
Proctor, Robert W. | 1 |
Rayner, Keith | 1 |
Slowiaczek, Maria L. | 1 |
Taatgen, Niels A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anderson, John R.; Taatgen, Niels A.; Byrne, Michael D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005
E. Hazeltine, D. Teague, and R. B. Ivry have presented data that have been interpreted as evidence against a central bottleneck. This article describes simulations of their Experiments 1 and 4 in the ACT-R cognitive architecture, which does possess a central bottleneck in production execution. The simulation model is capable of accounting for the…
Descriptors: Responses, Reaction Time, Simulation, Cognitive Processes
Cho, Yang Seok; Lien, Mei-Ching; Proctor, Robert W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
Stroop dilution is the reduction of the Stroop effect in the presence of a neutral word. It has been attributed to competition for attention between the color word and neutral word, to competition between all stimuli in the visual field, and to perceptual interference. Five experiments tested these accounts. The critical manipulation was whether…
Descriptors: Color, Reaction Time, Visual Stimuli, Visual Perception

Rayner, Keith; Slowiaczek, Maria L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
McClelland and O'Regan's interpretation of data may not be appropriate. One could argue that subjects used different strategies in the expectation and no-expectation conditions. Second, an inappropriate baseline condition may have been used. Finally their results may not be generalizable to the use of parafoveal vision during reading. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Context Clues, Eye Fixations, Eye Movements