Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Phonology | 3 |
| Syllables | 3 |
| Language Research | 2 |
| Linguistic Theory | 2 |
| Structural Analysis… | 2 |
| English | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Language Acquisition | 1 |
| Repetition | 1 |
| Young Children | 1 |
Source
| Language and Cognitive… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMarshall, Chloe R. – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2012
The study by Tamburelli, Jones, Gobet, and Pine (2012; henceforth TJGP) is a very welcome addition to the body of work concerning nonword repetition in typical development. TJGP go beyond previous work in considering three syllabic positions--onset, nucleus, and coda--with the aim of investigating how the positional role of phonemes within the…
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Language Acquisition, Phonology, Repetition
Peer reviewedRoelofs, Ardi – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2002
This commentary on a research study by Santiago et al. (2000) suggests that a reanalysis of the data that takes word length into account leads to a conclusion that is the opposite of what the study found. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Language Research, Linguistic Theory, Phonology, Structural Analysis (Linguistics)
Peer reviewedSantiago, Julio; MacKay, Donald G.; Palma, Alfonso – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2002
Responds to a commentary written in response a research study conducted by the author (Santiago et al., 2000) that suggests that a reanalysis of the data on syllable structure effects that takes word length into account leads to a conclusion that is the opposite of what the study found. (Author/VWL)
Descriptors: Language Research, Linguistic Theory, Phonology, Structural Analysis (Linguistics)
