NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vonen, Arnfinn Muruvik – Sign Language Studies, 2006
Inspired by Johnston's thought-provoking article, this article reports from the current Norwegian scene to make two main points. First, Norwegian Sign Language paradoxically appears to be better protected as well as more threatened than ever. Second, success in bilingual deaf education is not logically incompatible with a placement primarily in…
Descriptors: Deafness, Norwegian, Sign Language, Mainstreaming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mitchell, Ross E. – Sign Language Studies, 2006
My response to Johnston's (2004) "W(h)ither the Deaf Community?" is theoretical in nature and sociological in perspective. I comment on how Johnston's particular concern for the possible demise of Australian Sign Language (Auslan) in Australia's currently transforming social and medical context surrounding childhood deafness is legitimate but…
Descriptors: Deafness, Sign Language, Normalization (Disabilities), Assistive Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moores, Donald F. – Sign Language Studies, 2006
Responding to Johnston's projections for the future of Australian Sign Language (Auslan), I analyzed school enrollments in American educational programs and found similar trends. There are fewer deaf and hard of hearing children in school now than twenty years ago, with the largest decline, approximately 50 percent, among children with profound…
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Enrollment Trends, Assistive Technology, Deafness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Armstrong, David F. – Sign Language Studies, 1988
Academic acceptance of American Sign Language (ASL) and its speakers can be achieved if higher education institutions make affirmative action training and employment commitments to deaf individuals. (CB)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, American Sign Language, College Faculty, Deafness