Descriptor
| Behavior Patterns | 4 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Court Role | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Definitions | 1 |
| Freedom of Information | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWakefield, Jerome C. – Psychological Review, 1991
The definition of mental disorder in the third edition of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (DSM-III-R) explains that a disorder is harmful and represents a dysfunction, but it fails to capture the idea of dysfunction. Ideas for increasing the conceptual validity of the definition are presented. (SLD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Classification, Clinical Diagnosis, Criticism
Peer reviewedRosen, Marvin – Mental Retardation, 1993
The methodology of many studies that have identified specific genetic loci for disorders associated with mental retardation is criticized as failing to demonstrate an association between the behavior phenotype and the genetic marker. A more appropriate methodology using a multitrait-multimethod approach is suggested. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Correlation, Genetics, Mental Retardation
Peer reviewedGresham, Frank M. – School Psychology Review, 1984
The evidence for the psychometric adequacy of behavioral interviews in terms of traditional psychometric theory and generalizability theory are reviewed. The review resulted in the conclusion that behavioral interviews have some evidence for interrater reliability, content validity, and criterion-related validity. Additional research in several…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Behavior Problems, Functional Behavioral Assessment, Generalizability Theory
Schwartz, Thomas A. – 1986
To determine whether U.S. Supreme Court judges have a systematic attitude toward court cases dealing with the law of newsgathering and fair trial-free press, and whether that attitude can help predict the outcome of the pending case Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court (II), this paper applies an attitudinal theory from the field of social…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Court Litigation, Court Role, Freedom of Information


