Descriptor
Court Litigation | 4 |
Drug Use Testing | 4 |
Due Process | 4 |
Search and Seizure | 3 |
Student Rights | 3 |
Athletes | 2 |
College Athletics | 2 |
Constitutional Law | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Intercollegiate Cooperation | 2 |
Public Schools | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Sultanik, Jeffrey T. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
In response to an earlier article by Eugene Lincoln, presents two hypothetical cases that respectively deal with the possible effects of drug use on school premises and with a policy governing mandatory urine testing for student athletes. Cites factors that should be incorporated in any mandatory drug testing policy. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing

Evans, John M. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) drug-testing program affects thousands of collegiate athletes. This article examines the web of testing procedures and raises questions about the legitimate interest of the program; focuses on federal and state constitutional limitations; and suggests some ways to correct operating procedures.…
Descriptors: College Athletics, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing

Teagarden, C. Claude – West's Education Law Reporter, 1991
Examines the National Collegiate Athletic Association's drug testing program of student-athletes and relevant legal decisions. Concludes that each individual urinalysis search, not based on suspicion, is a violation of the student-athlete's privacy and is an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (100 references) (MLF)
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation
Bartlett, Larry D. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1993
Reviews court rulings on the issue of school authority over out-of-school conduct of student athletes and others involved in extracurricular activities. Questions why good conduct rules can be so easily justified to the satisfaction of judges, although the problems with which they are designed to deal continue to exist and grow. (MLF)
Descriptors: Alcohol Abuse, Athletes, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy