Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Coding | 3 |
Experiments | 3 |
Data Analysis | 2 |
Error Correction | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Memory | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Prediction | 2 |
Recognition (Psychology) | 2 |
Articulation (Speech) | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Jang, Yoonhee | 1 |
Mickes, Laura | 1 |
Oppenheim, Gary M. | 1 |
Ratcliff, Roger | 1 |
Rotello, Caren M. | 1 |
Starns, Jeffrey J. | 1 |
Wixted, John T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Starns, Jeffrey J.; Rotello, Caren M.; Ratcliff, Roger – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Koen and Yonelinas (2010; K&Y) reported that mixing classes of targets that had short (weak) or long (strong) study times had no impact on zROC slope, contradicting the predictions of the encoding variability hypothesis. We show that they actually derived their predictions from a mixture unequal-variance signal detection (UVSD) model, which…
Descriptors: Evidence, Prediction, Study Habits, Models
Oppenheim, Gary M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Corley, Brocklehurst, and Moat (2011) recently demonstrated a phonemic similarity effect for phonological errors in inner speech, claiming that it contradicted Oppenheim and Dell's (2008) characterization of inner speech as lacking subphonemic detail (e.g., features). However, finding "an effect" in both inner and overt speech is not the same as…
Descriptors: Inner Speech (Subvocal), Articulation (Speech), Phonemics, Exhibits
Jang, Yoonhee; Mickes, Laura; Wixted, John T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
The slope of the z-transformed receiver-operating characteristic (zROC) in recognition memory experiments is usually less than 1, which has long been interpreted to mean that the variance of the target distribution is greater than the variance of the lure distribution. The greater variance of the target distribution could arise because the…
Descriptors: Research Design, Prediction, Recognition (Psychology), Memory