NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Reply to Humphreys' and Parsons'"Piagetian Tasks Measure Intelligence and Intelligence Tests Assess Cognitive Development."
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glass, Gene V.; Stephens, Beth – Intelligence, 1980
Relationships among Piagetian reasoning assessments and standard measures of intelligence and achievement were determined in 1972 by Stephens, McLaughlin, Miller, and Glass (EJ 055 112). The data were reanalyzed by Humphreys and Parsons in 1979 (EJ 218 642). In reply, Glass and Stephens note fallacies in Humphreys' and Parsons' reasoning.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
Don't Throw Out the Piagetian Baby with the Psychometric Bath: Reply to Humphreys and Parsons.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kohlberg, Lawrence; DeVries, Rheta – Intelligence, 1980
These authors cite their own study of the relationship between traditional measures of intelligence and Piagetian measures of cognitive development in support of Glass and Stephens' contention that there are important qualitative differences. They question Humphreys' and Parsons' conclusions on both substantive and factor theoretical grounds. (CTM)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
Multidimensional Students' Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness--Generalizability of "N = 1" Research: Comment on Marsh (1991).
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abrami, Philip C.; d'Apollonia, Sylvia – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
Limitations of the confirmatory factor analysis conducted by H. W. Marsh to demonstrate the multidimensionality of a rating form to assess student evaluation of teaching effectiveness are discussed. A secondary analysis suggests that dimensionality is not stable across solutions and a global factor can be retrieved. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Factor Structure, Faculty Evaluation, Generalizability Theory