Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
Psychological Methods | 2 |
Statistics Education Research… | 2 |
Cognition | 1 |
Harvard Educational Review | 1 |
Psychological Review | 1 |
Author
Beyth-Marom, Ruth | 1 |
Carver, Ronald P. | 1 |
Cohen, L. Jonathan | 1 |
Cumming, Geoff | 1 |
Fischhoff, Baruch | 1 |
Gorard, Stephen | 1 |
Killeen, Peter R. | 1 |
Nicholson, James | 1 |
Ridgway, Jim | 1 |
Stallings, William M. | 1 |
White, Patrick | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Opinion Papers | 8 |
Journal Articles | 7 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gorard, Stephen; White, Patrick – Statistics Education Research Journal, 2017
In their response to our paper, Nicholson and Ridgway agree with the majority of what we wrote. They echo our concerns about the misuse of inferential statistics and NHST in particular. Very little of their response explicitly challenges the points we made but where it does their defence of the use of inferential techniques does not stand up to…
Descriptors: Statistical Inference, Statistics, Statistical Significance, Probability
Nicholson, James; Ridgway, Jim – Statistics Education Research Journal, 2017
White and Gorard make important and relevant criticisms of some of the methods commonly used in social science research, but go further by criticising the logical basis for inferential statistical tests. This paper comments briefly on matters we broadly agree on with them and more fully on matters where we disagree. We agree that too little…
Descriptors: Statistical Inference, Statistics, Teaching Methods, Criticism
Killeen, Peter R. – Psychological Methods, 2010
Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010) have provided sophisticated grounding for "p[subscript rep]." Computing it precisely appears, fortunately, no more difficult than doing so approximately. Their analysis will help move predictive inference into the mainstream. Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010) have also validated…
Descriptors: Replication (Evaluation), Measurement Techniques, Research Design, Research Methodology
Cumming, Geoff – Psychological Methods, 2010
This comment offers three descriptions of "p[subscript rep]" that start with a frequentist account of confidence intervals, draw on R. A. Fisher's fiducial argument, and do not make Bayesian assumptions. Links are described among "p[subscript rep]," "p" values, and the probability a confidence interval will capture…
Descriptors: Replication (Evaluation), Measurement Techniques, Research Methodology, Validity

Cohen, L. Jonathan – Cognition, 1980
Kahneman and Tversky's critique of Cohen's position on adults' probability reasoning is not valid. If they think Baconian logic is normatively unsound, the onus is on them to explain why. It is valid and useful because nature itself is full of causal processes. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Deduction, Hypothesis Testing, Logical Thinking

Fischhoff, Baruch; Beyth-Marom, Ruth – Psychological Review, 1983
This article explores the potential of Bayesian inference as a theoretical framework for describing how people evaluate hypotheses. First, it identifies a set of logically possible forms of non-Bayesian behavior. Second, it reviews existing research in a variety of areas to see whether these possibilities are ever realized. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Bias, Experimenter Characteristics, Hypothesis Testing
Stallings, William M. – 1985
In the educational research literature alpha, the a priori level of significance, and p, the a posteriori probability of obtaining a test statistic of at least a certain value when the null hypothesis is true, are often confused. Explanations for this confusion are offered. Paradoxically, alpha retains a prominent place in textbook discussions of…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Hypothesis Testing, Multivariate Analysis, Probability

Carver, Ronald P. – Harvard Educational Review, 1978
Reviews case against using traditional statistical methods in educational research. Examines "fantasies" entertained by researchers about the meaning of statistical significance. Recommends abandoning statistical significance testing and suggests other ways of evaluating research results. Advocates a return to the scientific method of examining…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Differences, Educational Research, Hypothesis Testing