NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heraud, Richard; Tesar, Marek – Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2017
Professor Michael A. Peters has worked in an era of transformation that has taken him from a labour-intensive paper-based form of production to the computerised reproduction of thought, and the current shift in the publishing landscape from a reader-subscription to an author-pays model. Most of what he has learned in publishing and editing he has…
Descriptors: Interviews, Electronic Publishing, Publishing Industry, Authors
Jeske, Jeff – 1989
The peer-group method of composition instruction represents the quintessence of the "environmental" mode of teaching which brings teacher, student, and materials more nearly into balance. Responding to recent criticisms of peer-response groups, a model was developed to establish a middle course, balancing (1) philosophical stances; (2)…
Descriptors: Editing, Group Discussion, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Adams, Dennis – TechTrends, 1988
Discusses recent developments in video technology, especially small format video, that have made possible low cost instructional television production. Highlights include a new production model, orienting the client to the instructional design process, techniques for in-house video productions, editing, and possible uses for this new technology.…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Editing, Educational Television, Instructional Design
Forbes, Christopher J. – Technical Writing Teacher, 1986
Offers a plan for developing student editing skills in the beginning technical writing class. Suggests guidelines that parallel the revision-oriented heuristics of such scholars as Michael Flanigan and Linda Flower. (FL)
Descriptors: Editing, Higher Education, Models, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cane, Barbara H. – Journal of Legal Education, 1981
The law review, it is suggested, is a species of publication that exists primarily to be written, not to be read. How the institution came into being, how a law review actually functions, and the consequences of the dominant law review pattern for legal education and the profession are examined. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Competitive Selection, Editing, Education Work Relationship