Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Predictive Validity | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Disadvantaged | 1 |
| Economic Development | 1 |
| Economic Impact | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMiles, Eleanor; Sheeran, Paschal; Webb, Thomas L. – Psychological Bulletin, 2013
Augustine and Hemenover (2013) were right to state that meta-analyses should be accurate and generalizable. However, we disagree that our meta-analysis of emotion regulation strategies (Webb, Miles, & Sheeran, 2012) fell short in these respects. Augustine and Hemenover's concerns appear to have accrued from misunderstandings of our inclusion…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Accuracy, Self Control
Baker, Keith – AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 2010
The justification for national standards is that test scores predict a nation's future economic success. There is no evidence that supports this assumption. There is evidence that it is wrong. For more than half a century, reformers have been trying to fix our schools with little success. The obvious conclusion is that something that can't be…
Descriptors: Test Results, Disadvantaged, National Standards, Economic Impact
