Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Reliability | 2 |
| Structural Equation Models | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Geometric Concepts | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Psychology | 1 |
| Statistics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkYang, Yanyun; Green, Samuel B. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2011
Coefficient alpha is almost universally applied to assess reliability of scales in psychology. We argue that researchers should consider alternatives to coefficient alpha. Our preference is for structural equation modeling (SEM) estimates of reliability because they are informative and allow for an empirical evaluation of the assumptions…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Reliability, Measures (Individuals)
Pan, Tianshu; Yin, Yue – Psychological Methods, 2012
In the discussion of mean square difference (MSD) and standard error of measurement (SEM), Barchard (2012) concluded that the MSD between 2 sets of test scores is greater than 2(SEM)[superscript 2] and SEM underestimates the score difference between 2 tests when the 2 tests are not parallel. This conclusion has limitations for 2 reasons. First,…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Geometric Concepts, Tests, Structural Equation Models
