Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Editing | 13 |
Research Reports | 13 |
Educational Research | 5 |
Scholarly Journals | 5 |
Writing for Publication | 5 |
Peer Evaluation | 4 |
Scholarship | 4 |
Technical Writing | 4 |
Periodicals | 3 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Academic Discourse | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Opinion Papers | 13 |
Journal Articles | 10 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Emerson, Tisha L. N. – Journal of Economic Education, 2014
One associate editor's perspective on classroom experiment articles is detailed in this article. The associate editor provides recommendations for manuscripts for the Instruction (those that describe new classroom experiments) and Research (those reporting studies into the efficacy of classroom experiments as a pedagogical tool) Sections of…
Descriptors: Classroom Research, Classroom Techniques, Writing for Publication, Research Methodology
Morton, James P. – Advances in Physiology Education, 2009
In the sequel to their guidelines for reporting statistics in American Physiological Society journals, Curran-Everett and Benos highlighted that the initial guidelines of 2004 have had little effect on the statistical reporting practices of authors. In the present article, I suggest that the guidelines have also had little impact on both journal…
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Scholarship, Writing (Composition), Periodicals
Casanave, Christine Pearson – Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2008
The way we use words to discuss complex phenomena such as writing for scholarly publication matters greatly, particularly if we are distinguishing between EAL writers and English L1 gatekeepers. In this response to Flowerdew, I argue that using Goffman's concept of stigma to discuss possible discrimination against EAL writers serves only to…
Descriptors: Scholarship, Periodicals, Labeling (of Persons), Editing

Grant, Carl A.; Graue, Elizabeth – Review of Educational Research, 1997
The new editors of the "Review of Educational Research" recognize their charge to be comprehensive in the process of review of educational research and to be of service to educators. They also acknowledge the challenge to be nurtured by the scholarship of the times and innovations in education. (SLD)
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Educational Research, Evaluation Utilization
McCarron, William E. – Technical Writing Teacher, 1978
Describes the practical and persuasive functions of technical writing in business; outlines the tasks of the technical editor as they relate to direct communication and accuracy. (MAI)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Communication (Thought Transfer), Editing, Persuasive Discourse

Donmoyer, Robert – Educational Researcher, 1996
The new Features Editor of the "Educational Researcher" articulates policies, procedures, and rules that guide the manuscript review process. The issues confronting the editor in this field highlight larger issues of the meaning of research and scholarly discourse. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Editing, Educational Research, Research Reports
Avery, Robert K.; McCain, Thomas A. – 1984
The observations gleaned from the experiences of two editors of speech communication journals served as the basis for the identification of the limitations inherent in research studies employing qualitative methods. Among their observations are the following: (1) qualitative research remains a relatively ill defined descriptor which embodies a…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Editing, Evaluation Methods, Research Methodology
Kumashiro, Kevin K. – Harvard Educational Review, 2005
In this conversation, Kevin K. Kumashiro shares his reflections on challenges to publishing anti-oppressive research in educational journals. He then invites eight current and former editors of leading educational research journals--William F. Pinar, Elizabeth Graue, Carl A. Grant, Maenette K. P. Benham, Ronald H. Heck, James Joseph Scheurich,…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Periodicals, State of the Art Reviews, Criticism

Murray, Frank B.; Raths, James – Review of Educational Research, 1996
Factors that might influence the editorial process of peer review of articles are explored. These include the willingness of reviewers to perform the review, uninformed reviews, ideological or political bias, ethical conflicts of interest, and mistaken views of fairness. Awareness of these factors can help ensure article quality. (SLD)
Descriptors: Bias, Editing, Ethics, Ideology
Sims, R. L. – 1983
The key to producing professional quality documents is the dialogue between writers and editors. Such a dialogue should include six major components: genuineness, accurate empathetic understanding, unconditional positive regard, presentness, a spirit of mutual equality, and a supportive psychological climate. Such an atmosphere was created at one…
Descriptors: Authors, Cooperation, Editing, Interpersonal Communication

Good, Ronald G.; Wandersee, James H. – Educational Researcher, 1991
The consistent application of sound criteria will increase the reliability of manuscript reviews, but many other factors contribute to low quality research articles. The central question must be whether or not the study was worth doing. Familiarity with the research domain is a necessity for appropriate research evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Editing, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Levin, Joel R.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1993
Journal editors respond to criticisms of reliance on statistical significance in research reporting. Joel R. Levin ("Journal of Educational Psychology") defends its use, whereas William D. Schafer ("Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development") emphasizes the distinction between statistically significant and important. William Asher…
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Educational Assessment, Educational Research
Jackson, Eugene B. – 1982
This paper advocates the involvement of librarians in the publishing process and examines the mechanics of that process. Concerns of librarians, engineers, and publishers are delineated, with examples taken from the internal and external dissemination of technical information by a major U.S. government research agency and various large industrial…
Descriptors: Editing, Engineers, Graduate Students, Higher Education