NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vasquez, Melba J. T.; Jones, James M. – American Psychologist, 2007
Responds to comments made by Pipes and Kuncel and Sackett on the current authors' original article (see record 2006-01690-003). The current authors respond to the various points raised in the commenting articles, and suggest that diversity is a compelling interest and affirmative action is one means of achieving it. They stand by their original…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Outcomes of Education, Cultural Pluralism, Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lippmann, Walter – Educational Forum, 1986
The author answers Terman's allegations. He states that, while he honestly thinks that there is a considerable future for mental testing, it is also a field that could be dangerous if the people in positions of leadership are "loose-minded." (CT)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Test Bias, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Terman, Lewis M. – Educational Forum, 1986
Examines a few samples of Walter Lippmann's allegations concerning the validity of intelligence tests. (CT)
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Test Bias, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schutz, Richard E. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1985
This paper updates the concept of test validity. This new conception entails a set of 10 categories combined together in pairs: curriculum and instructional validity, statutory and forensic validity, media and journalistic validity, political and legislative validity, and partisan and activist validity. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Politics of Education, Predictive Validity, Psychometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blanchard, Jay S. – Reading Teacher, 1987
Evaluates the Computer-Based Assessment Instrument (CRAI) as a test for reading proficiency. Notes strengths of CRAI, including its use as a quick assessment of silent reading comprehension level, and the problems with readability and content specific words lists and the lack of scoring features. (JC)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods