Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Item Analysis | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Affective Behavior | 1 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Davenport, Ernest C. | 1 |
| Davison, Mark L. | 1 |
| Harris, Christine | 1 |
| Liou, Pey-Yan | 1 |
| Love, Quintin U. | 1 |
| Pashler, Harold | 1 |
| Vul, Edward | 1 |
| Winkielman, Piotr | 1 |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDavenport, Ernest C.; Davison, Mark L.; Liou, Pey-Yan; Love, Quintin U. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2016
The main points of Sijtsma and Green and Yang in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice (34, 4) are that reliability, internal consistency, and unidimensionality are distinct and that Cronbach's alpha may be problematic. Neither of these assertions are at odds with Davenport, Davison, Liou, and Love in the same issue. However, many authors…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Reliability, Validity, Test Construction
Download full textVul, Edward; Harris, Christine; Winkielman, Piotr; Pashler, Harold – Online Submission, 2009
We are grateful to the commentators for providing many stimulating and valuable observations. The main point of our article was to call attention to the overestimation of individual differences correlations in a subset of neuroimaging papers. To structure our discussion of these comments, we list the main points from our paper, note where…
Descriptors: Social Cognition, Individual Differences, Psychological Patterns, Correlation
