(The Androgyny Dimension: A Comment on Stokes, Childs, and Fuehrer: And a Response.).

Lubinski, David; Stokes, Joseph

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ274119

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1983-Jan

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

(The Androgyny Dimension: A Comment on Stokes, Childs, and Fuehrer: And a Response.)

Lubinski, David; Stokes, Joseph

Journal of Counseling Psychology, v30 n1 p130-36 Jan 1983

Suggests a critical methodological flaw in a study done about the relationship between the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and certain indices of self-disclosure (Stokes, et al.). Notes that multiple regression analysis was not performed in appropriate hierarchical fashion. Includes Stokes reply to the critique. (PAS)

Descriptors: Androgyny, Multiple Regression Analysis, Position Papers, Research Methodology, Self Concept, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Sex Role

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Opinion Papers

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Bem Sex Role Inventory

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A