Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Sternberg, Robert J. | 4 |
Carroll, John B. | 3 |
Jensen, Arthur R. | 3 |
Elkind, David | 2 |
Humphreys, Lloyd G. | 2 |
Hunt, Earl | 2 |
Alexander, Karl L. | 1 |
Anglin, Jacqueline | 1 |
Badger, Elizabeth | 1 |
Banich, Marie | 1 |
Barba, Robertta H. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Adult Education | 2 |
Audience
Researchers | 8 |
Practitioners | 5 |
Teachers | 3 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Social Security Disability… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 3 |
Learning Potential Assessment… | 2 |
Canfield Learning Styles… | 1 |
Embedded Figures Test | 1 |
Learning Style Profile (NASSP) | 1 |
Raven Advanced Progressive… | 1 |
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wiebe, Sandra A.; McFall, G. Peggy – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2014
Since Miyake and his colleagues (2000) published their seminal paper on the use of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to parse executive function (EF), CFA methods have become ubiquitous in EF research. In their interesting and thoughtful Focus article, "Executive Function: Formative Versus Reflective Measurement," Willoughby and…
Descriptors: Executive Function, Cognitive Measurement, Factor Analysis, Individual Development
Eid, Michael; Koch, Tobias – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2014
Higher-order factor analysis is a widely used approach for analyzing the structure of a multidimensional test. Whenever first-order factors are correlated researchers are tempted to apply a higher-order factor model. But is this reasonable? What do the higher-order factors measure? What is their meaning? Willoughby, Holochwost, Blanton, and Blair…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Measurement, Theories, Executive Function
Willoughby, Michael T. – Grantee Submission, 2014
The focus article (Willoughby et al., 2014) (1) introduced the distinction between formative and reflective measurement and (2) proposed that performance-based executive function tasks may be better conceptualized from the perspective of formative rather than reflective measurement. This proposal stands in sharp contrast to conventional…
Descriptors: Executive Function, Formative Evaluation, Cognitive Measurement, Factor Analysis
De Houwer, Jan; Teige-Mocigemba, Sarah; Spruyt, Adriaan; Moors, Agnes – Psychological Bulletin, 2009
The authors of this reply article note that B. Gawronski, E. P. LeBel, K. R. Peters, and R. Banse (2009) (a) expressed agreement in their comment with the analysis put forward in the target article (J. De Houwer, S. Teige-Mocigemba, A. Spruyt, & A. Moors, 2009) and (b) pointed to a further implication for the way in which the implicitness of a…
Descriptors: Research, Memory, Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Measurement
Fischer, Kurt W.; Stein, Zachary; Heikkinen, Katie – American Psychologist, 2009
Intellectual and psychosocial functioning develop along complex learning pathways. Steinberg, Cauffman, Woolard, Graham, and Banich measured these two classes of abilities with narrow, biased assessments that captured only a segment of each pathway and created misleading age patterns based on ceiling and floor effects. It is a simple matter to…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Adolescent Development, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement
Steinberg, Laurence; Cauffman, Elizabeth; Woolard, Jennifer; Graham, Sandra; Banich, Marie – American Psychologist, 2009
The authors respond to both the general and specific concerns raised in Fischer, Stein, and Heikkinen's commentary on their article (Steinberg, Cauffman, Woolard, Graham, & Banich), in which they drew on studies of adolescent development to justify the American Psychological Association's positions in two Supreme Court cases involving the…
Descriptors: Adolescent Development, Maturity (Individuals), Court Litigation, Reader Response
Goldman, Susan R. – Learning and Instruction, 2009
Based on a critical re-analysis of cognitive load theory (CLT), Schnotz and Kurschner identified the need for research on more sensitive ways of assessing learner characteristics, both prior to and during instruction, in order to understand learning processes and outcomes. One emergent theme of the papers in this special issue is that the "same"…
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Learning Processes, Difficulty Level, Cognitive Processes
Fu, Wai-Tat – Cognitive Science, 2008
Griffiths, Christian, and Kalish (this issue) present an iterative-learning paradigm applying a Bayesian model to understand inductive biases in categorization. The authors argue that the paradigm is useful as an exploratory tool to understand inductive biases in situations where little is known about the task. It is argued that a theory developed…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Schemata (Cognition), Schematic Studies, Psychometrics
Unsworth, Nash – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2007
Two experiments explored the possibility that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) partially reflect differences in the size of the search set from which items are retrieved. High- and low-WMC individuals were tested in delayed (Experiment 1) and continuous distractor (Experiment 2) free recall with varying list lengths. Across…
Descriptors: Retention (Psychology), Individual Differences, Recall (Psychology), Simulation
Karelitz, Tzur M. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2008
What is the nature of latent predictors that facilitate diagnostic classification? Rupp and Templin (this issue) suggest that these predictors should be multidimensional, categorical variables that can be combined in various ways. Diagnostic Classification Models (DCM) typically use multiple categorical predictors to classify respondents into…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Item Response Theory, Predictor Variables, Educational Diagnosis
Sternberg, Robert J. – 1980
This article discusses the nature of intelligence, introducing a new distinction between macrocomponents and microcomponents of human intelligence. Microcomponents are fairly elementary operations such as inference and application of analogical relations. Macrocomponents are the global-level constellations of processes that are formed from…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Intelligence, Theories

Bond, James A.; Buchtel, Henry A. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1984
Criticizes correlational comparisons of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Halstead Category Test (Pendleton and Heaton, 1982) regarding assessment of cognitive abilities. Recommends asking patients to think aloud while performing on the tests as a more direct approach to understanding the cognitive components of the test. (LLL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Analysis, Correlation

Feuerstein, Reuven; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1981
The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD) is presented as an approach to the production and measurement of cognitive change. The paper presents three empirical studies illustrating how the LPAD may be applied in solving practical problems with important educational and social implications for teaching handicapped or disadvantaged students.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Disabilities, Disadvantaged

Jensen, Arthur R. – Intelligence, 1987
Psychometric g is by far more highly correlated with all tests conventionally called "IQ," cognitive abilities, and the like, than any other single factor or combination of other factors independent of g. Researchers must now examine the nature of psychometric g, including its causal underpinnings. (LMO)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests

Carroll, John B.; Horn, John L. – American Psychologist, 1981
Argues that despite aberrations, false starts, misapplications, and unfortunate crystallizations of methods and interpretations, the differential psychology of cognitive abilities is an important part of psychological knowledge about human beings. (Author/GC)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Intelligence, Intelligence Quotient