NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Guskey, Thomas R.; McTighe, Jay – Educational Leadership, 2016
Nearly every modern instructional planning model, differentiation approach, and personalized learning system incorporates some form of re-assessment. Yet there's scant research evidence that teachers use pre-assessment in ways that improve learning, according to Guskey and McTighe. To increase the likelihood that pre-assessment will be worth the…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Teaching Methods, Evaluation Methods, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nordengren, Chase; Guskey, Thomas R. – Learning Professional, 2020
The importance of high-quality evaluation is underscored in Learning Forward's Standards for Professional Learning: Evaluation provides information that supports advocates, professional learning planners, and anyone who wants to know "about the contribution of professional learning to student achievement" (Learning Forward, 2011). Most…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Academic Achievement, Decision Making
Royal, Kenneth D.; Guskey, Thomas R. – Online Submission, 2014
A common practice in medical education is to create a prescribed distribution of grades, or ratings, so that only a certain percentage of students receive the highest marks. This approach typically is employed to curb grade inflation and as a means to help faculty distinguish outstanding performers. Despite the well-intentioned reasoning for using…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Medical Education, Grade Inflation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2011
Educators seeking to reform grading must combat five long-held traditions that stand as formidable obstacles to change: (1) Grades should provide the basis for differentiating students; (2) grade distributions should resemble a bell-shaped curve; (3) grades should be based on students' standing among classmates; (4) poor grades prompt students to…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Academic Achievement, Grading, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jung, Lee Ann; Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2010
Teachers often grapple with the challenge of giving report card grades to students with learning disabilities and English language learners. The authors offer a five-step model that "offers a fair, accurate, and legal way to adapt the grading process for exceptional learners." The model begins with a high-quality reporting system for all students…
Descriptors: Report Cards, Student Needs, Grades (Scholastic), Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guskey, Thomas R.; Jung, Lee Ann – Theory Into Practice, 2009
Teachers at all levels of education today struggle in their efforts to assign fair, accurate, and meaningful grades to students with disabilities, especially those placed in general education classrooms. Lacking specific policies or recommendations, most teachers apply informal, individual grading adaptations for such students. Although these…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Disabilities, Classroom Environment, Special Needs Students
Guskey, Thomas R. – 1999
Basic questions about the evaluation of professional development efforts are explored, including the nature and purposes of evaluation, the critical levels of professional development evaluation, and the difference between evidence and proof in evaluation. Evaluation, which is defined as the systematic investigation of merit or worth, can be…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Professional Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guskey, Thomas R. – Journal of Staff Development, 2005
Accountability is now a requirement in education, and that extends to professional development. Leaders must understand what evaluation is, what its purposes are, and the critical levels of professional development evaluation to be able to provide meaningful data that demonstrate the difference professional learning makes.
Descriptors: Accountability, Professional Development, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guskey, Thomas R. – Journal of Staff Development, 2003
The No Child Left Behind Act's requirements for scientifically based research and new accountability standards will affect how professional development leaders do their work. Meeting the new requirements means leaders must more carefully evaluate new programs of professional learning and assess the results. Evaluation must become a given, not an…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Faculty Development, Teacher Improvement, Educational Legislation