NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Thomas, Kelli; Huffman, Douglas; Clarkson, Lesa Covington – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2008
The purpose of this article is to describe evaluation capacity building using an immersion approach in two schools: one with an administrator-led process and one with a teacher-led process. The descriptions delineate conceptual, developmental, and sustainability aspects of capacity building through the perspectives of the teachers, principals, and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Teaching Methods, Administrators, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Proposes a new metaphorical framework for understanding and using mixed methods evaluation. Uses the archipelago as a metaphor for resolving the challenges presented by a mixed methods approach, this allowing the simultaneous consideration of different methods and stances. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Metaphors, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Gullickson, Arlen; Toal, Stacie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
Use of evaluation findings is a valued outcome for most evaluators. However, to optimize use, the findings need to be disseminated to potential users in formats that facilitate use of the information. This reflective case narrative uses a national evaluation of a multisite National Science Foundation (NSF) program as the setting for describing the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Audiences, Strategic Planning, Information Dissemination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas; McGinnis, J. Randy – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
In this article, the authors examine evaluation process use in a large multilevel, multisite core evaluation. This case highlights the nature of the evaluation processes of the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP) core evaluation in terms of four categories: (1) social processing; (2) engagement; (3) involvement; and (4)…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lawrenz, Frances; Huffman, Douglas – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
Nationally, there is continuing debate about appropriate methods for conducting educational evaluations. The U.S. Department of Education has placed a priority on "scientifically" based evaluation methods and has advocated a "gold standard" of randomized controlled experimentation. The priority suggests that randomized control methods are best,…
Descriptors: Quasiexperimental Design, Information Technology, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Katzenmeyer, Conrad; Lawrenz, Frances – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
This article presents a brief history of the National Science Foundation's involvement in education evaluation, reviews the program evaluations that NSF's Division of Research, Evaluation, and Communication (REC) has conducted in recent years, and describes future directions. The evaluations have reflected the field-driven nature of NSF's…
Descriptors: Teacher Characteristics, Program Evaluation, Teaching Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huffman, Douglas; Lawrenz, Frances; Thomas, Kelli; Clarkson, Lesa – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
Building the evaluation capacity of K-12 schools is clearly an important goal for the field of evaluation, especially in the current educational environment, which is dominated by issues of accountability and high-stakes testing. The focus on student achievement has forced schools to become more data-driven as they attempt to analyze test scores…
Descriptors: Urban Schools, Graduate Students, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods