Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Writing Evaluation | 3 |
Models | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Writing Tests | 2 |
Conflict | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
Educational Principles | 1 |
Ethics | 1 |
Evaluators | 1 |
Group Activities | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessing Writing | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Colombini, Crystal Broch; McBride, Maureen – Assessing Writing, 2012
Composition assessment scholars have exhibited uneasiness with the language of norming grounded in distaste for the psychometric assumption that achievement of consensus in a communal assessment setting is desirable even at the cost of individual pedagogical values. Responding to the problems of a "reliability" defined by homogenous agreement,…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Conflict, Test Norms, Reliability
Knoch, Ute – Assessing Writing, 2011
Rating scales act as the de facto test construct in a writing assessment, although inevitably as a simplification of the construct (North, 2003). However, it is often not reported how rating scales are constructed. Unless the underlying framework of a rating scale takes some account of linguistic theory and research in the definition of…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Rating Scales, Linguistic Theory
Slomp, David H.; Fuite, Jim – Assessing Writing, 2004
Specialists in the field of large-scale, high-stakes writing assessment have, over the last forty years alternately discussed the issue of maximizing either reliability or validity in test design. Factors complicating the debate--such as Messick's (1989) expanded definition of validity, and the ethical implications of testing--are explored. An…
Descriptors: Information Theory, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Test Validity