Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Higher Education | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Accountability | 1 |
Cheating | 1 |
College Freshmen | 1 |
Competency Based Education | 1 |
Curriculum Design | 1 |
Educational Assessment | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 4 |
Author
Bloxham, Sue | 1 |
David Boud | 1 |
Edwards, Corony | 1 |
Evans, Carol | 1 |
Forsythe, Alex | 1 |
Kandiko Howson, Camille | 1 |
Margaret Bearman | 1 |
Mollie Dollinger | 1 |
Nulty, Duncan D. | 1 |
Phillip Dawson | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Phillip Dawson; Margaret Bearman; Mollie Dollinger; David Boud – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Cheating attracts a significant amount of attention in conversations about assessment, and with good reason: if students cheat, we cannot be sure they have met the learning outcomes of their course. In this conceptual article we question the attention given to cheating as a concept and argue that the broader concept of validity is a more important…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Inclusion, Test Validity
Evans, Carol; Kandiko Howson, Camille; Forsythe, Alex; Edwards, Corony – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021
Over the last 20 years there has been significant growth in the volume of higher education pedagogical research across disciplines and national contexts, but inherent tensions in defining quality remain. In this paper we present a framework to support understanding of what constitutes internationally excellent research, drawing on a range of…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Higher Education, Educational Research, Scholarship
Nulty, Duncan D. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2011
This paper reviews the literature about peer and self-assessment in university courses from the point of view of their use, and the suitability of their use, in the first year of university study. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part argues that although first-year students are involved in many of the studies that report on the…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Program Effectiveness, Literature Reviews, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Bloxham, Sue – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2009
This article challenges a number of assumptions underlying marking of student work in British universities. It argues that, in developing rigorous moderation procedures, we have created a huge burden for markers which adds little to accuracy and reliability but creates additional work for staff, constrains assessment choices and slows down…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Higher Education, Misconceptions, Grading