Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Error Patterns | 2 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Examiners | 1 |
| Measurement | 1 |
| Quality Control | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Scoring | 1 |
| Statistical Bias | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 1 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Allalouf, Avi; Gutentag, Tony; Baumer, Michal – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2017
Quality control (QC) in testing is paramount. QC procedures for tests can be divided into two types. The first type, one that has been well researched, is QC for tests administered to large population groups on few administration dates using a small set of test forms (e.g., large-scale assessment). The second type is QC for tests, usually…
Descriptors: Quality Control, Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Error Patterns
Clauser, Amanda L.; Wainer, Howard – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2016
It is widely accepted dogma that consequential decisions are better made with multiple measures, because using but a single one is thought more likely to be laden with biases and errors that can be better controlled with a wider source of evidence for making judgments. Unfortunately, advocates of using multiple measures too rarely provide detailed…
Descriptors: Tests, Examiners, College Entrance Examinations, Measurement

Peer reviewed
Direct link
