Descriptor
Source
Structural Equation Modeling | 14 |
Author
Asparouhov, Tihomir | 1 |
Bechger, Timo | 1 |
Bentler, Peter M. | 1 |
Bollen, Kenneth A. | 1 |
Costner, Herbert L. | 1 |
Dolan, Conor | 1 |
Dolan, Conor V. | 1 |
Glaser, Dale N. | 1 |
Hancock, Gregory R. | 1 |
Hayduk, Leslie A. | 1 |
Herting, Jerald R. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 14 |
Reports - Descriptive | 14 |
Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hancock, Gregory R.; Kuo, Wen-Ling; Lawrence, Frank R. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Using higher order factor models, this article illustrates latent curve analysis for the purpose of modeling longitudinal change directly in a latent construct. Provides examples with simultaneous estimation of covariance and mean structures for a single-group and two-group structure. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Factor Analysis, Mathematical Models

Markus, Keith A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Explores the four-step procedure for testing structural equation models and outlines some problems with the approach advocated by L. Hayduk and D. Glaser (2000) and S. Mulaik and R. Milsap (2000). Questions the idea that there is a "correct" number of constructs for a given phenomenon. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models

Hayduk, Leslie A.; Glaser, Dale N. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Focuses on the four-step method (four nested models) of structural equation modeling advocated by S. Mulaik (1997, 1998), discussing the limitations of the approach and considering the tests and criteria to be used in moving among the four steps. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models

Mulaik, Stanley A.; Millsap, Roger E. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Defends the four-step approach to structural equation modeling based on testing sequences of models and points out misunderstandings of opponents of the approach. The four-step approach allows the separation of respective constraints within a structural equation model. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models

Bollen, Kenneth A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Neither the four-step model nor the one-step procedure can actually tell whether the researcher has the right number of factors in structural equation modeling. In fact, for reasons discussed, a simple formulaic approach to the correct specification of models does not yet exist. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
Lubke, Gitta H.; Muthen, Bengt O. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
Treating Likert rating scale data as continuous outcomes in confirmatory factor analysis violates the assumption of multivariate normality. Given certain requirements pertaining to the number of categories, skewness, size of the factor loadings, and so forth, it seems nevertheless possible to recover true parameter values if the data stem from a…
Descriptors: Likert Scales, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Multivariate Analysis

Herting, Jerald R.; Costner, Herbert L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Examines some positions in various arguments related to the proper number of factors and proper number of steps when using structural equation models. Defines the issue in estimating structural equation models as a problem of specifying a model appropriately based on theoretical concerns and then diagnosing ills in the model as well as possible.…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
Moustaki, Irini; Joreskog, Karl G.; Mavridis, Dimitris – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
We consider a general type of model for analyzing ordinal variables with covariate effects and 2 approaches for analyzing data for such models, the item response theory (IRT) approach and the PRELIS-LISREL (PLA) approach. We compare these 2 approaches on the basis of 2 examples, 1 involving only covariate effects directly on the ordinal variables…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis

Dolan, Conor; Bechger, Timo; Molenaar, Peter – Structural Equation Modeling, 1999
Considers models incorporating principal components from the perspectives of structural-equation modeling. These models include the following: (1) the principal-component analysis of patterned matrices; (2) multiple analysis of variance based on principal components; and (3) multigroup principal-components analysis. Discusses fitting these models…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Factor Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Matrices
Asparouhov, Tihomir – Structural Equation Modeling, 2005
This article reviews several basic statistical tools needed for modeling data with sampling weights that are implemented in Mplus Version 3. These tools are illustrated in simulation studies for several latent variable models including factor analysis with continuous and categorical indicators, latent class analysis, and growth models. The…
Descriptors: Probability, Structural Equation Models, Sampling, Least Squares Statistics

Steiger, James H. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Discusses two criticisms raised by L. Hayduk and D. Glaser of the most commonly used point estimate of the Root Mean Square Error (RMSEA) and points out misconceptions in their discussion. Although there are apparent flaws in their arguments, the RMSEA is open to question for several other reasons. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Factor Analysis, Hypothesis Testing

Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Discusses issues related to model evaluation in structural equation modeling. Supports nested model comparisons via sequential chi-square difference tests as consistent with the four-step approach to model evaluation when models of the factor analytic simultaneous equation type are entertained. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Chi Square, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure
Dolan, Conor V.; Wicherts, Jelte M.; Molenaar, Peter C. M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
We consider the question of how variation in the number and reliability of indicators affects the power to reject the hypothesis that the regression coefficients are zero in latent linear regression analysis. We show that power remains constant as long as the coefficient of determination remains unchanged. Any increase in the number of indicators…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis, Regression (Statistics), Evaluation Methods

Raines-Eudy, Ruth – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Demonstrates empirically a structural equation modeling technique for group comparison of reliability and validity. Data, which are from a study of 495 mothers' attitudes toward pregnancy, have a one-factor measurement model and three sets of subpopulation comparisons. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Mothers, Parent Attitudes