NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bernard, Robert M.; Borokhovski, Eugene; Schmid, Richard F.; Waddington, David I.; Pickup, David – Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2017
Research evidence concerning the effects of adaptive teaching and individualized learning remain relatively inconclusive, while there is obviously a need for better understanding how K-12 formal education may be more successful in addressing students' personal needs and interests, accounting for their diverse abilities with the main goal of…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Individualized Instruction, Adaptive Testing, Student Centered Learning
NWEA, 2017
Stepstone's educational leaders knew they needed a research-based assessment to support differentiation and track performance against rigorous state standards. They chose computer adaptive MAP® Growth™ K-2 to keep the team's mix of face-to-face and technology-based instruction focused on student learning and growth. MAP Growth K-2 reinforces…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Achievement Gains, Academic Achievement, Charter Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thissen, David – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2016
David Thissen, a professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Quantitative Program at the University of North Carolina, has consulted and served on technical advisory committees for assessment programs that use item response theory (IRT) over the past couple decades. He has come to the conclusion that there are usually two purposes…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Construction, Testing Problems, Student Evaluation
Olson, Allan – School Administrator, 2007
Educators are becoming more aware of the limitations of testing that simply measures student achievement at a single point in time, such as benchmark tests, locally constructed formative tests, conventional standardized tests, and state assessments used to determine adequate yearly progress under No Child Left Behind. Not surprisingly, school…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Resource Allocation, Educational Improvement, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Olson, Allan – Educational Leadership, 2005
Most educators agree that the primary criterion of school success is the ongoing growth and achievement of every student even in the midst of constant debate about the state of the US education and conflicting opinions regarding the value of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Standardized tests have their place, but computerized adaptive testing aimed…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Standardized Tests, Adaptive Testing, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Snyder, Lynn; Caccamise, Donna; Wise, Barbara – Topics in Language Disorders, 2005
This article discusses the main purposes of reading comprehension assessment and identifies the key features of good assessment. The article also identifies pitfalls that clinicians and educators should avoid to conduct valid assessments of reading comprehension, such as the degree to which the measure taps the constructive and integrative…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Content Validity, Academic Achievement, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lin, Hong; Dwyer, Francis – TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 2006
According to the Committee on the Foundations of Educational Assessment, traditional educational assessment does a reasonable job of measuring knowledge of basic facts, procedures and proficiency of an area of the curriculum. However, the traditional approach fails to capture the breadth and richness of knowledge and cognition. Such a concern…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Assessment, Computers, Thinking Skills