Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Coding | 3 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Asynchronous Communication | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Computer Mediated… | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bendixen, Lisa D. | 1 |
| Erduran, Sibel | 1 |
| Fitch, Peggy | 1 |
| Hartley, Kendall | 1 |
| Osborne, Jonathan | 1 |
| Simon, Shirley | 1 |
| Spatariu, Alexandru | 1 |
| Steinke, Pamela | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textSteinke, Pamela; Fitch, Peggy – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2017
Bias is part of the human condition and becoming aware of how to avoid bias will help to ensure greater accuracy in the work of assessment. In this paper the authors discuss three different theoretical frameworks that can be applied when assessing student work for cognitive skills such as critical thinking and problem solving. Each of the…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Cognitive Ability, Critical Thinking, Thinking Skills
Direct linkErduran, Sibel; Simon, Shirley; Osborne, Jonathan – Science Education, 2004
This paper reports some methodological approaches to the analysis of argumentation discourse developed as part of the two-and-a-half year project titled "Enhancing the Quality of Argument in School Science" supported by the Economic and Social Research Council in the United Kingdom. In this project researchers collaborated with…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Foreign Countries, Research Methodology, Science Teachers
Spatariu, Alexandru; Hartley, Kendall; Bendixen, Lisa D. – Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2004
In support of research examining relationships between learner characteristics and the quality of online discussions, this paper surveys different methods for evaluating discussions. The paper will present coding methods used in our own research as well as methods used by others interested in quality online discussions. Key topics include what…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Discussion Groups, Discourse Analysis, Educational Quality
