Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 9 |
Computation | 9 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 8 |
Test Items | 7 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Psychometrics | 3 |
Test Construction | 3 |
Computer Software | 2 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Item Banks | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Psychological… | 4 |
Journal of Educational and… | 2 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Perspectives in Education | 1 |
Psychological Review | 1 |
Author
Armstrong, Ronald D. | 1 |
Belov, Dmitry I. | 1 |
Belur, Madhu N. | 1 |
Busemeyer, Jerome R. | 1 |
Chaporkar, Prasanna | 1 |
Emre Gonulates | 1 |
Harold Doran | 1 |
Johnson, Joseph G. | 1 |
Magis, David | 1 |
Matteucci, Mariagiulia | 1 |
Meijer, Rob R. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Descriptive | 9 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Harold Doran; Testsuhiro Yamada; Ted Diaz; Emre Gonulates; Vanessa Culver – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Computer adaptive testing (CAT) is an increasingly common mode of test administration offering improved test security, better measurement precision, and the potential for shorter testing experiences. This article presents a new item selection algorithm based on a generalized objective function to support multiple types of testing conditions and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Algorithms
Moothedath, Shana; Chaporkar, Prasanna; Belur, Madhu N. – Perspectives in Education, 2016
In recent years, the computerised adaptive test (CAT) has gained popularity over conventional exams in evaluating student capabilities with desired accuracy. However, the key limitation of CAT is that it requires a large pool of pre-calibrated questions. In the absence of such a pre-calibrated question bank, offline exams with uncalibrated…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Thissen, David – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2016
David Thissen, a professor in the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Quantitative Program at the University of North Carolina, has consulted and served on technical advisory committees for assessment programs that use item response theory (IRT) over the past couple decades. He has come to the conclusion that there are usually two purposes…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Construction, Testing Problems, Student Evaluation
Veldkamp, Bernard P.; Matteucci, Mariagiulia; de Jong, Martijn G. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013
Item response theory parameters have to be estimated, and because of the estimation process, they do have uncertainty in them. In most large-scale testing programs, the parameters are stored in item banks, and automated test assembly algorithms are applied to assemble operational test forms. These algorithms treat item parameters as fixed values,…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Test Items, Item Banks, Automation
Magis, David; Raiche, Gilles – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is an active current research field in psychometrics and educational measurement. However, there is very little software available to handle such adaptive tasks. The R package "catR" was developed to perform adaptive testing with as much flexibility as possible, in an attempt to provide a developmental and…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Measurement, Psychometrics, Computer Assisted Testing
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics
Belov, Dmitry I.; Armstrong, Ronald D.; Weissman, Alexander – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2008
This article presents a new algorithm for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) when content constraints are present. The algorithm is based on shadow CAT methodology to meet content constraints but applies Monte Carlo methods and provides the following advantages over shadow CAT: (a) lower maximum item exposure rates, (b) higher utilization of the…
Descriptors: Test Items, Monte Carlo Methods, Law Schools, Adaptive Testing
Revuelta, Javier – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2004
This article presents a psychometric model for estimating ability and item-selection strategies in self-adapted testing. In contrast to computer adaptive testing, in self-adapted testing the examinees are allowed to select the difficulty of the items. The item-selection strategy is defined as the distribution of difficulty conditional on the…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Evaluation Methods
Johnson, Joseph G.; Busemeyer, Jerome R. – Psychological Review, 2005
Preference orderings among a set of options may depend on the elicitation method (e.g., choice or pricing); these preference reversals challenge traditional decision theories. Previous attempts to explain these reversals have relied on allowing utility of the options to change across elicitation methods by changing the decision weights, the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Decision Making, Stimulation