Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Decision Making | 4 |
Sanctions | 4 |
Student Behavior | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Student Personnel Services | 2 |
Accountability | 1 |
Behavior Problems | 1 |
Behavior Standards | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Civil Rights | 1 |
Counseling Techniques | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
College Student Affairs… | 1 |
Journal of College and… | 1 |
New Directions for Evaluation | 1 |
New Directions for Student… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ashley, Evelyn L.; Miller, Tony, Jr. – College Student Affairs Journal, 2022
The students at Southern Methodist University (SMU) did not have a favorable view of the Office of Student Conduct & Community Standards. To change this connotation, the staff members developed a new innovative sanctioning model to allow students to select their educational sanctions. The model is inspired by restorative justice and is in line…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Behavior, Discipline Policy, Student Personnel Services
Fueglein, Jennifer S.; Price, Kevin S.; Alicea-Rodriguez, Adriana; McKinney, Jan Wilson; Jimenez, Anne L. – Journal of College and Character, 2012
As universities look for more effective ways to address violations of behavioral standards, a proposed solution is to infuse intentional development into well-established conduct processes inherently focused on legal mandates and due process. The E.P.I.C. Journey Sanctioning Model was designed to refocus the outcomes of the conduct process to…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Behavior, Behavior Problems, Behavior Standards
Ragle, John D.; Paine, Gage E. – New Directions for Student Services, 2009
The Assessment-Intervention of Student Problems (AISP) model is a useful tool for preparing student affairs professionals to assess the problems of disturbed, disturbing, or disturbed/disturbing students and to make appropriate referrals. It is particularly useful because it emphasizes the necessity of developing an integrated system for this…
Descriptors: Student Problems, Sanctions, School Security, Referral
Schmitt, Lisa N. T.; Whitsett, Maria Defino – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
A district evaluator in a large Texas district examines new challenges arising since implementation of No Child Left Behind, relating to (1) navigating competing requirements in state and federal accountability systems; (2) evaluating effectiveness of sanctions districts are required to address; (3) using scientifically based research (SBR) to…
Descriptors: Management Systems, Evaluators, Sanctions, Educational Research