Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Hamilton, Jack A. | 4 |
Baker, Octave V. | 2 |
Kaplan, Carol B. | 2 |
Lipe, Dewey | 2 |
McBain, Susan L. | 2 |
Mitchell, Anita M. | 2 |
Alexander, Neil | 1 |
Anderlini, Lyn Starr | 1 |
Anderson, Jacquelyn | 1 |
Arbreton, Amy J. A. | 1 |
Baggett, David | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 5 |
Community | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
California | 4 |
Minnesota | 4 |
Pennsylvania | 4 |
Illinois | 3 |
Canada | 2 |
Florida | 2 |
South Dakota | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
Arkansas | 1 |
Arkansas (Little Rock) | 1 |
Germany | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment | 1 |
Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wharton, Tracy; Alexander, Neil – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
This article describes lessons learned about implementing evaluations in hospital settings. In order to overcome the methodological dilemmas inherent in this environment, we used a practical participatory evaluation (P-PE) strategy to engage as many stakeholders as possible in the process of evaluating a clinical demonstration project.…
Descriptors: Hospitals, Demonstration Programs, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Fredericks, Kimberly A.; Deegan, Michael; Carman, Joanne G. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Evaluators are often faced with many challenges in the design and implementation of a program's evaluation. Because programs are entangled in complex networks of structures and stakeholders, they can be challenging to understand, and they often pose issues of competing and conflicting goals. However, by using a systems mapping approach to…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Demonstration Programs, Developmental Disabilities, Systems Approach

McGraw, Sarah A.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1989
The methodology and design of the process evaluation system of the Pawtucket Heart Health Program (an 11-year project for changing/documenting change in cardiovascular disease risk status of a northeastern city's residents) are described. Examples of the system's use are provided. The maintenance of such a system without substantial evaluation…
Descriptors: Community Programs, Data Analysis, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods
Anderlini, Lyn Starr; Zittel, Gail – 1983
The report describes a sample of effective vocational assessment practices for handicapped students implemented in California. An introduction presents the challenges and difficulties of complying with federal and state legislation that mandate nondiscriminatory vocational assessment and the least restrictive placement. Alternatives to…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Demonstration Programs, Disabilities, Evaluation Methods
Scott, Aurelia C.; Bourexis, Patricia S. – 1982
The implications of the lessons learned through an evaluability assessment (EA) of the Title II Basic Skills Improvement Program (BSIP) for State Education Agency (SEA) support of model demonstration programs are discussed. The purposes, methodology and uses of the EA process are presented. Also included is a discussion of the details of the…
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Demonstration Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Bellamy, G. Thomas; And Others – 1980
The project addressed the discrepancy between research (documenting the vocational potential of severely handicapped adults) and current services (which include an expanding national program of nonvocational day activity centers) with five coordinated components designed to improve, implement, and evaluate vocational services. The first component,…
Descriptors: Adults, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods, Models

Petersilia, Joan – Evaluation Review, 1989
The 11 programs and sites participating in the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) Intensive Supervision Demonstration Project are described. The demonstration was designed to assess the effects and costs of sentencing convicted felons to community-based programs. The evaluation by the Rand Corporation and data collection methods and random…
Descriptors: Community Programs, Correctional Rehabilitation, Criminals, Demonstration Programs
Walder, Leopold O.; And Others – 1976
An evaluation of the "Project Advance" program at the Morse Crisis Intervention Center was conducted. Review of documents, formal and informal interviews, questionnaires and direct observations were the methods used to assess the correspondence between the objectives of the program and its achievements. The evidence, based on findings from…
Descriptors: Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods, Intervention, Interviews

Roberts, Helen R. – 1992
This final report describes activities and achievements of a two-year qualitative study to determine factors that contribute to successful campus implementation of student outcomes assessment by evaluating 15 student outcomes assessment pilot projects in the California State University system. Data sources included the evaluation reports from each…
Descriptors: College Outcomes Assessment, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education

Hunt, Frances M.; And Others – Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1990
The Early Intervention Program of the Department of Behavioral Psychology at the Kennedy Institute and the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine is a demonstration, research, and training program focused on the primary and secondary prevention of serious childhood behavior problems. Four assessment and intervention protocols are described…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Behavior Problems, Demonstration Programs, Early Childhood Education
Pennsylvania Univ., Philadelphia. Wharton Industrial Research Unit. – 1976
Two industrial programs designed to validly select employees for first line supervisory positions are examined in order to determine the capability of these selection programs to institutionalize the upward mobility of the disadvantaged into management positions. One program analyzed--assessment center--is a selection process specifically designed…
Descriptors: Administrators, Demonstration Programs, Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods

Germer, Polly; Price, James H. – Journal of School Health, 1981
The success of a health fair as a source of health education and promoter of healthful behaviors depends to a great extent on the organizational expertise of the sponsor. In order to organize a successful health fair, objectives, target population, location, time, financing, and publicity must be considered. (JN)
Descriptors: Decision Making Skills, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods, Exhibits

Post, John O., Jr. – Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1979
The problem dealt with here is that of developing evaluation procedures that will determine, through objective evidence, the merit of a demonstration project that uses an infusion approach to career education in an ongoing school system. The design of this process has emerged from the Occupational Competence Access Project. (Author)
Descriptors: Career Education, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Sailor, Wayne; Goetz, Lori – 1981
The final report presents summary data on the accomplishments of a project serving deaf-blind children who were also severely, multiply handicapped. The project operated a model classroom for six to eight students in a San Francisco public school to develop and demonstrate innovative educational practices and assessment systems for visual and…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Deafness, Demonstration Programs, Evaluation Methods
Black, Talbot; And Others – 1981
The paper considers the concept of needs assessment in terms of the activities of TADS (Technical Assistance Development System), a project to provide support services to model demonstration projects and state education agency grantees of the Handicapped Children's Early Education Program. Section 1 defines needs assessment, describes approaches…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Delivery Systems, Demonstration Programs, Disabilities