NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Teachers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nguyen, Joseph G.; Keuseman, Kristopher J.; Humston, Jonathan J. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2020
When campuses across the world needed to transition to the online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there were many challenges educators faced, and addressing academic integrity issues were some of the most important. Certain strategies, such as online proctoring or additional software, were not available to most institutions because the…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Online Courses, Distance Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Troy, Jesse D.; Neely, Megan L.; Pomann, Gina-Maria; Grambow, Steven C.; Samsa, Gregory P. – Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2022
Student evaluation is a key consideration for educational program administrators because program success depends on students' ability to demonstrate successful development of core competencies. Student evaluations must therefore be aligned with learning objectives and overall program goals. Graduate level educational programs typically incorporate…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Statistics Education, Alignment (Education)
Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, 2022
Work produced during a course of study in the creative arts may differ from assessment in other disciplines in the following ways: (1) it is non-text-based: work may consist of a performance, video recording, digital or interactive work, music composition, audio recording, or physical artefact; and (2) it is creative: works demonstrate individual…
Descriptors: Integrity, Creative Activities, Art Education, Video Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Eaton, Sarah Elaine; Guglielmin, Melanie; Otoo, Benedict Kojo – Online Submission, 2017
Plagiarism continues to be an issue in postsecondary contexts. This paper discusses how educators can take a proactive stance to prevent plagiarism and cultivate students' sense of honour and academic integrity, rather than focusing on punitive consequences after plagiarism has already occurred. Strategies include assessment design, formative…
Descriptors: Plagiarism, Higher Education, Postsecondary Education, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Selbach-Allen, Megan E.; Greenwald, Sarah J.; Ksir, Amy E.; Thomley, Jill E. – PRIMUS, 2020
In this paper, we compare and contrast our experiences in using standards-based grading in different courses and across two separate institutions to explore the related tradeoffs and subtleties in designing and implementing such grading systems, guided by innovation diffusion theory. We summarize our individual courses, use Linda Nilson's criteria…
Descriptors: Grading, Standards, Evaluation Methods, College Faculty
Briggs, Linda L. – Campus Technology, 2013
When it comes to secure testing online, even high-tech solutions rely on an old standby: a human proctor. This article asks the question: Is such an approach sustainable in the long run? A student labors over a midterm exam while a vigilant proctor peers over his shoulder, watching for any sign of cheating. It sounds like a tableau from a century…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Laverty, James T.; Bauer, Wolfgang; Kortemeyer, Gerd; Westfall, Gary – Physics Teacher, 2012
It is almost universally agreed that more frequent formative assessment (homework, clicker questions, practice tests, etc.) leads to better student performance and generally better course evaluations. There is, however, only anecdotal evidence that the same would be true for more frequent summative assessment (exams). There maybe many arguments…
Descriptors: Cheating, Homework, Guessing (Tests), Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
White, Peter; Syncox, David; Alters, Brian – Interactive Learning Environments, 2011
Using classroom response systems (clickers) to accumulate grade-points has become a controversial practice as response systems have become more widely used in the last decade. Although some instructors opt to use clickers on a non-grades basis, it has become quite common to reward students for (a) correct answers, (b) participating in clicker…
Descriptors: Constructivism (Learning), Cheating, Grades (Scholastic), Rewards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shulman, Lee S. – New Educator, 2008
The author begins with an extended account of the manner in which popular accounts treat the topic of mentoring or coaching. This treatment is contrasted with the problems of coaching described in other articles in this issue, especially in connection to the National Board portfolio assessment. The distinction between "mediated" and "unmediated"…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), Mentors, Portfolio Assessment, Doctoral Dissertations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lee, Daniel E. – Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2009
Regrettably, cheating is widespread on all levels of our educational system. Effective monitoring and judicial review processes that ensure that students who cheat are subjected to appropriate disciplinary action are essential. However, policing is not enough. We must go beyond policing to change the culture of the classroom in ways that…
Descriptors: Discipline, Cheating, Court Litigation, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walden, Kim; Peacock, Alan – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2006
In recent years there has been a marked change in our cultural relationship with information which has implications for our teaching and learning practices. Current concerns about the identification of, and responses to, plagiarism are grounded in that process of change. In this paper we take the position that it is better to address and respond…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Plagiarism, Information Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chiesl, Newell – Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2007
The Internet, coupled with technology, has enabled institutions of higher learning to offer online distance education classes to a worldwide student body at an increasing rate. In the next 5 years it is estimated that nearly 90% of universities will offer online classes. Unfortunately, the news is not all that good. Students are now cheating at an…
Descriptors: Cheating, Distance Education, Ethics, Student Behavior
Chauncey, Caroline, Ed. – Harvard Education Press, 2007
"Harvard Education Letter" is published bimonthly at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. This issue of "Harvard Education Letter" contains the following articles: (1) More Than "Making Nice": Getting Teachers to (Truly) Collaborate (Laura Pappano); (2) "Doing the Critical Things First": An Aligned Approach to PreK and Early Elementary Math;…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Teacher Collaboration, Mathematics Instruction, Elementary School Mathematics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Hamilton, Margaret; Richardson, Joan – Journal of Learning Design, 2007
In this paper, we discuss the role of the educator in terms of designing a learning environment for the student which encourages the student to develop their own academic integrity. In such an environment, there is no need for the student to resort to plagiarism, as the learning and assessment tasks are not conducive to cheating, being unique and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Plagiarism, Student Evaluation, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rovai, Alfred P. – Internet and Higher Education, 2000
Identifies the major principles of general assessment theory, examines how these principles can be applied to online environments for distance education, and describes assessment issues that have special significance in virtual classrooms. Discusses proctored testing, identity security, academic honesty, and use of online discussions for…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Security, Constructivism (Learning), Discussion (Teaching Technique)