Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Education Endowment Foundation | 2 |
Educational Researcher | 1 |
Journal of Education for… | 1 |
National Center for Education… | 1 |
Research Synthesis Methods | 1 |
Author
Lortie-Forgues, Hugues | 2 |
Angela C. Webster | 1 |
Angie Barba | 1 |
Anna Lene Seidler | 1 |
Ben W. Mol | 1 |
Bibi Groot | 1 |
Cheung, Alan C. K. | 1 |
Chris Brown | 1 |
Coldwell, Mike | 1 |
Demack, Sean | 1 |
Inglis, Matthew | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 6 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kylie E. Hunter; Mason Aberoumand; Sol Libesman; James X. Sotiropoulos; Jonathan G. Williams; Jannik Aagerup; Rui Wang; Ben W. Mol; Wentao Li; Angie Barba; Nipun Shrestha; Angela C. Webster; Anna Lene Seidler – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Increasing concerns about the trustworthiness of research have prompted calls to scrutinise studies' Individual Participant Data (IPD), but guidance on how to do this was lacking. To address this, we developed the IPD Integrity Tool to screen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for integrity issues. Development of the tool involved a literature…
Descriptors: Integrity, Randomized Controlled Trials, Participant Characteristics, Computer Software
Lortie-Forgues, Hugues; Inglis, Matthew – Educational Researcher, 2019
In this response, we first show that Simpson's proposed analysis answers a different and less interesting question than ours. We then justify the choice of prior for our Bayes factors calculations, but we also demonstrate that the substantive conclusions of our article are not substantially affected by varying this choice.
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Bayesian Statistics, Educational Research, Program Evaluation
Demack, Sean; Maxwell, Bronwen; Coldwell, Mike; Stevens, Anna; Wolstenholme, Claire; Reaney-Wood, Sarah; Stiell, Bernadette; Lortie-Forgues, Hugues – Education Endowment Foundation, 2021
This document summarises key findings from the quantitative strands of a review of the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) evaluations that had reported from the establishment of EEF in 2011 up to January 2019. The quantitative strands summarised include meta-analyses of effect sizes reported for attainment outcomes and descriptive analyses of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Disadvantaged Youth, Meta Analysis, Effect Size
Slavin, Robert E.; Cheung, Alan C. K. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2017
Large-scale randomized studies provide the best means of evaluating practical, replicable approaches to improving educational outcomes. This article discusses the advantages, problems, and pitfalls of these evaluations, focusing on alternative methods of randomization, recruitment, ensuring high-quality implementation, dealing with attrition, and…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Evaluation Methods, Recruitment, Attrition (Research Studies)
Jake Anders; Chris Brown; Melanie Ehren; Toby Greany; Rebecca Nelson; Jessica Heal; Bibi Groot; Michael Sanders; Rebecca Allen – Education Endowment Foundation, 2017
Evaluating the impact of complex whole-school interventions (CWSIs) is challenging. However, what evidence there is suggests that school leadership and other elements of whole-school contexts are important for pupils' attainment (Leithwood et al., 2006), suggesting that interventions aimed at changing these have significant potential to improve…
Descriptors: Leadership Styles, Program Implementation, Leadership Responsibility, Program Evaluation
Schochet, Peter Z. – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2017
Design-based methods have recently been developed as a way to analyze data from impact evaluations of interventions, programs, and policies. The impact estimators are derived using the building blocks of experimental designs with minimal assumptions, and have good statistical properties. The methods apply to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and…
Descriptors: Design, Randomized Controlled Trials, Quasiexperimental Design, Research Methodology