Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
New Directions for Evaluation | 3 |
American Journal of Evaluation | 1 |
Educational Evaluation and… | 1 |
Evaluation and Program… | 1 |
Evaluation and Program… | 1 |
New Directions for… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 11 |
Journal Articles | 8 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Policymakers | 2 |
Location
United States | 3 |
Africa | 1 |
Asia | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
Japan | 1 |
Minnesota | 1 |
South America | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Volkov, Boris B. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
This chapter features a recent conversation with Dr. Arnold J. Love, a long-time proponent of internal evaluation and one of the most cited internal evaluation authors. In 1983, Love edited the first issue of "New Directions for Program Evaluation" on the topic of internal evaluation. He is the author of the book "Internal…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Program Evaluation, Interviews, Organizational Development
King, Jean A.; Rohmer-Hirt, Johnna A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
From the 1980s to the present, educational accountability in the United States has grown dramatically. Such accountability in U.S. school districts, although driven primarily by external demands, has internal manifestations as well. The chapter traces the historical development of internal evaluation in American school districts, then highlights…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Testing Programs, Standardized Tests, School Districts

Light, Richard J., Ed. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2001
The seven chapters of this volume demonstrate that evaluation evidence can overturn widely held beliefs and result in changes in programs and policies. These chapters show that policymakers can welcome findings that challenge long-established ideas and use them to Improve programs and services. (SLD)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Evaluation Utilization, Policy Formation, Program Evaluation

Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2001
Focuses on the ideal future of evaluation as a discipline, including evaluation in the nonacademic world and evaluation as it applies to elementary, secondary, and higher education. In the ideal future, evaluation will be fully accepted as a key discipline and will be fully used in rational discourse and policy decisions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Higher Education

Tornatzky, Louis G.; Johnson, Elmima C. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1982
In view of social processes, politics and the logistics of conducting evaluations, several implicit assumptions of the field challenged by findings on innovation implementation are reviewed. These studies have major implications for evaluation practice, evaluator roles, the use of evaluation results, and the federal role in evaluation. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Federal Government, Innovation

Millsap, Mary Ann – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
The Experience Based Career Education (EDCE) program serves as a focal point of a cast study documenting how the National Institute of Education secured Office of Education funds to demonstrate an R&D innovation. Serious questions are raised about the regulations-writing process and the use of evaluation information. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Career Awareness, Case Studies, Evaluation Utilization, Federal Programs
Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO. – 1999
This booklet examines performance-based education accountability systems in the United States. It defines the four components of these accountability systems--standards and assessments, multiple indicators, rewards, and sanctions--and discusses which ones are found in each state and whether or not they appear in law or regulation. All four…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accountability, Comparative Analysis, Educational Policy

Palumbo, Dennis J.; Hallett, Michael A. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1993
Traditional evaluation approaches assume that consensus can be reached among policymakers, managers, and staff about goals that should guide a program. Evaluations of juvenile detention facilities and a home arrest program illustrate that consensus is not always possible. A constructionist evaluation approach is recommended for such situations.…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Conflict, Decision Making, Delinquency
Ewell, Peter T. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005
This chapter discusses the evolution of alumni studies in the United States and how alumni data can be used to inform public policy.
Descriptors: Public Policy, Alumni, Graduate Surveys, College Outcomes Assessment

Fieweger, Margaret – 1995
This paper describes how the Northridge campus of California State University incorporated academic program assessment into its regular practices using opinion leaders, diffusion methods, and collaboration between faculty and administration. Elements of the assessment program included: (1) appointment of an assessment coordinator; (2) high…
Descriptors: Administrators, College Outcomes Assessment, Diffusion (Communication), Educational Assessment
Ligon, Glynn; Jackson, Elaine E. – 1988
The Linking Outcomes with Organizational Planning (LOOP) process, initiated in 1984 in the Austin (Texas) Independent School District (AISD) is described. Focus is on the successful conversion to on-line computer updates and the development of a training package for key staff on writing status reports. LOOP is a nine-step process for integrating…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Educational Planning, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education