NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hall, Amy Cox – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2019
In this practice paper I examine the evaluation of one project and ask whether or not the evaluation failed. I suggest that because I was unaware of the larger connections between the grant agency and the grantee I made tactical errors in the presentation of findings, which resulted in not simply disagreement but anger and resentment. I conclude…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Error Patterns, Psychological Patterns, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beard, Roger; Brooks, Greg; Ampaw-Farr, Jaz – Literacy, 2019
Successive UK government policies have strengthened the phonics element of the National Curriculum for English in England. The policies have included inviting publishers to submit completed self-assessments of their systematic phonics programmes. The self-assessment criteria focus on what is deemed to be 'high-quality provision', as defined in the…
Descriptors: Phonics, Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence, National Curriculum, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Golding, Clinton – Open Review of Educational Research, 2017
In the article, "What examiners do: What thesis students should know", we identified 11 things that thesis examiners do as they read and judge a thesis. But, we left a gap in the research: knowing this, What should thesis students do to write for their examiners? In this article, I fill the gap. The advice for thesis students is: first,…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Masters Theses, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation