Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
Structural Equation Modeling | 8 |
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 3 |
Assessment | 1 |
Child Psychiatry and Human… | 1 |
Multivariate Behavioral… | 1 |
Psychological Methods | 1 |
Author
Bentler, Peter M. | 2 |
Bollen, Kenneth A. | 1 |
Costner, Herbert L. | 1 |
Craske, Michelle G. | 1 |
David Goretzko | 1 |
Dolan, Conor V. | 1 |
Dormann, Christian | 1 |
Eid, Michael | 1 |
Geiser, Christian | 1 |
Glaser, Dale N. | 1 |
Hayashi, Kentaro | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 15 |
Reports - Descriptive | 15 |
Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Philipp Sterner; Kim De Roover; David Goretzko – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
When comparing relations and means of latent variables, it is important to establish measurement invariance (MI). Most methods to assess MI are based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Recently, new methods have been developed based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA); most notably, as extensions of multi-group EFA, researchers introduced…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Measurement Techniques, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models
Reise, Steven P. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2012
Bifactor latent structures were introduced over 70 years ago, but only recently has bifactor modeling been rediscovered as an effective approach to modeling "construct-relevant" multidimensionality in a set of ordered categorical item responses. I begin by describing the Schmid-Leiman bifactor procedure (Schmid & Leiman, 1957) and highlight its…
Descriptors: Models, Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Correlation
Geiser, Christian; Eid, Michael; Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. – Psychological Methods, 2008
In a recent article, A. Maydeu-Olivares and D. L. Coffman (2006, see EJ751121) presented a random intercept factor approach for modeling idiosyncratic response styles in questionnaire data and compared this approach with competing confirmatory factor analysis models. Among the competing models was the CT-C(M-1) model (M. Eid, 2000). In an…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Questionnaires
Hayashi, Kentaro; Bentler, Peter M.; Yuan, Ke-Hai – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
In the exploratory factor analysis, when the number of factors exceeds the true number of factors, the likelihood ratio test statistic no longer follows the chi-square distribution due to a problem of rank deficiency and nonidentifiability of model parameters. As a result, decisions regarding the number of factors may be incorrect. Several…
Descriptors: Researchers, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Structural Equation Models

Dormann, Christian – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Discusses techniques to account for unmeasured third variables in longitudinal designs, introducing a series of less restrictive synchronous common factor models as an extension of the synchronous common factor model. Recommends the use of such models, which can be tested by structural equation modeling, when possible third variables might have…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Longitudinal Studies, Structural Equation Models

Markus, Keith A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Explores the four-step procedure for testing structural equation models and outlines some problems with the approach advocated by L. Hayduk and D. Glaser (2000) and S. Mulaik and R. Milsap (2000). Questions the idea that there is a "correct" number of constructs for a given phenomenon. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models

Hayduk, Leslie A.; Glaser, Dale N. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Focuses on the four-step method (four nested models) of structural equation modeling advocated by S. Mulaik (1997, 1998), discussing the limitations of the approach and considering the tests and criteria to be used in moving among the four steps. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models

Mulaik, Stanley A.; Millsap, Roger E. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Defends the four-step approach to structural equation modeling based on testing sequences of models and points out misunderstandings of opponents of the approach. The four-step approach allows the separation of respective constraints within a structural equation model. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models

Bollen, Kenneth A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Neither the four-step model nor the one-step procedure can actually tell whether the researcher has the right number of factors in structural equation modeling. In fact, for reasons discussed, a simple formulaic approach to the correct specification of models does not yet exist. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models

Herting, Jerald R.; Costner, Herbert L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Examines some positions in various arguments related to the proper number of factors and proper number of steps when using structural equation models. Defines the issue in estimating structural equation models as a problem of specifying a model appropriately based on theoretical concerns and then diagnosing ills in the model as well as possible.…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Research Methodology, Structural Equation Models
van der Sluis, Sophie; Dolan, Conor V.; Stoel, Reinoud D. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2005
This article is concerned with the seemingly simple problem of testing whether latent factors are perfectly correlated (i.e., statistically indistinct). In recent literature, researchers have used different approaches, which are not always correct or complete. We discuss the parameter constraints required to obtain such perfectly correlated latent…
Descriptors: Testing, Factor Structure, Structural Equation Models, Correlation
Hazlett-Stevens, Holly; Ullman, Jodie B.; Craske, Michelle G. – Assessment, 2004
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) was originally designed as a unifactorial measure of pathological trait worry. However, recent studies supported a two-factor solution with positively worded items loading on the first factor and reverse-scored items loading on a second factor. The current study compared this two-factor model to a negative…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Psychometrics, Factor Structure, Questionnaires

Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Discusses issues related to model evaluation in structural equation modeling. Supports nested model comparisons via sequential chi-square difference tests as consistent with the four-step approach to model evaluation when models of the factor analytic simultaneous equation type are entertained. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Chi Square, Evaluation Methods, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure

Raines-Eudy, Ruth – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Demonstrates empirically a structural equation modeling technique for group comparison of reliability and validity. Data, which are from a study of 495 mothers' attitudes toward pregnancy, have a one-factor measurement model and three sets of subpopulation comparisons. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Mothers, Parent Attitudes
Uji, Masayo; Tanaka, Nao; Shono, Masahiro; Kitamura, Toshinori – Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2006
This study explored the factorial structure of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) in the Japanese population. Several differences between the structure model in the current study and Parker et al.'s original model were identified. We also examined the adaptability of the inventory to children currently being raised by parents. We also developed…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Factor Structure, Parent Child Relationship, Attachment Behavior