Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Identification | 3 |
Predictive Validity | 3 |
Academic Ability | 1 |
Academic Failure | 1 |
Academic Support Services | 1 |
Adult Education | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Caseworker Approach | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Criticism | 1 |
Data | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
Wechsler Preschool and… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pierson, Eric E.; Kilmer, Lydia M.; Rothlisberg, Barbara A.; McIntosh, David E. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2012
Schools often administer brief intelligence tests as the first step in the identification of students who are cognitively gifted. However, brief measures are often used without consideration of underlying constructs or the psychometric properties of the measures and without regard to the links between screening decisions and educational…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Gifted, Intelligence Tests, Identification
Lacefield, Warren E.; Applegate, E. Brooks; Zeller, Pamela J.; Van Kannel-Ray, Nancy; Carpenter, Shelly – Online Submission, 2011
This study describes a well-defined data-driven diagnostic identification and selection procedure for choosing students at-risk of academic failure for appropriate academic support services. This algorithmic procedure has been validated both by historical quantitative studies of student precedents and outcomes as well as by current qualitative…
Descriptors: Academic Failure, At Risk Students, Identification, Information Systems
Brown, Scott; Marley, A. A. J.; Lacouture, Yves – Psychological Review, 2007
N. Stewart, G. D. A. Brown, and N. Chater's relative judgment model includes three core assumptions that enable it to predict accurately the vast majority of "classical" phenomena in absolute identification choices, but not the time taken to make them, including sequential effects, such as assimilation and contrast. These core assumptions, coupled…
Descriptors: Prediction, Identification, Reader Response, Criticism