NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stepanovich, Paul L.; Hopkins, Pamela J.; Stark, Ernest – Management Teaching Review, 2017
Critical thinking requires that we dig beneath the surface of organizational issues to explore multiple views, context, and aspects of knowing. In this exercise, students explore these deeper issues with the question: Are incentives effective? A hypothetical case unfolds to show how two consulting groups can arrive at very different…
Descriptors: Incentives, Critical Thinking, Hypothesis Testing, Class Activities
Vandivere, Sharon; Malm, Karin – Child Trends, 2015
This document was produced by the authors based on their research for the report, "Family Finding Evaluations: A Summary of Recent Findings. Publication #2015-01," and is an added resource for further information. The report reviews the results from 13 evaluations of Family Finding. The Family Finding model provides child welfare…
Descriptors: Foster Care, Barriers, Family Relationship, Child Welfare
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weeks, Louise; Shane, Chris; MacDonald, Fiona; Hart, Craig; Smith, Roger – British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2006
This article is about a training project run by Central England People First (CEPF). CEPF has been doing workshops, conferences and other training for over 10 years. It seemed like a good idea to help other people with learning difficulties to learn how to be trainers. This would help them to speak out about their lives and the services they want.…
Descriptors: Peer Teaching, Learning Disabilities, Foreign Countries, Program Effectiveness
Hanes, John C.; Hail, Michael – 1999
Many program evaluations involve some type of statistical testing to verify that the program has succeeded in accomplishing initially established goals. In many cases, this takes the form of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with t-tests, analysis of variance, or some form of the general linear model. This paper contends that, at least…
Descriptors: Change, Educational Indicators, Evaluation Methods, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Katz, Richard S.; Eagles, Munroe – PS: Political Science and Politics, 1996
Constructs a model that explains a large fraction of the variance in political science departmental rankings. Divides the objective predictors into two sets: one reflecting faculty quality ratings of department members, the other the effects of circumstances beyond a department's control. This model works well with most social science disciplines.…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Analysis of Variance, Causal Models, Credentials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jackman, Robert W.; Siverson, Randolph M. – PS: Political Science and Politics, 1996
Analyzes the National Research Council's rating of political science departments and discovers the ratings reflect two general sets of characteristics, the size and productivity of the faculty. Reveals that the quality and impact of faculty research is more important than the overall output. Includes tables of statistical data. (MJP)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Analysis of Variance, Credentials, Departments