Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Gill, Brian P. | 1 |
| Gleason, Philip | 1 |
| Nichols-Barrer, Ira | 1 |
| Teh, Bing-ru | 1 |
| Tuttle, Christina Clark | 1 |
| de Anda, Diane | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arkansas | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textTuttle, Christina Clark; Teh, Bing-ru; Nichols-Barrer, Ira; Gill, Brian P.; Gleason, Philip – Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 2010
In this set of four supplemental tables, the authors compare the baseline test scores of the treatment and matched control group samples observed in each year after KIPP entry (outcome years 1 to 4). As discussed in Chapter III, the authors used an iterative propensity score estimation procedure to calculate each student's probability of entering…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Middle Schools, Student Characteristics, Tables (Data)
Peer reviewed
Direct linkde Anda, Diane – Children & Schools, 2007
This article discusses the difficulties in conducting intervention research or evaluating intervention programs in a school setting. In particular, the problems associated with randomization and obtaining control groups are examined. The use of quasi-experimental designs, specifically a paired comparison design using the individual as his or her…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Intervention, Research Design, Control Groups
