Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Informed Consent | 3 |
Research Projects | 3 |
Ethics | 2 |
Access to Information | 1 |
Action Research | 1 |
Administrative Principles | 1 |
Best Practices | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Cognitive Development | 1 |
College Administration | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Alcorn, Noeline | 1 |
Benitez, Josie | 1 |
Dooly, Melinda | 1 |
Foster-Hanson, Emily | 1 |
Leshin, Rachel A. | 1 |
Locke, Terry | 1 |
Moore, Emilee | 1 |
Moty, Kelsey | 1 |
O'Neill, John | 1 |
Ocampo, John Daryl | 1 |
Rhodes, Marjorie | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rhodes, Marjorie; Rizzo, Michael T.; Foster-Hanson, Emily; Moty, Kelsey; Leshin, Rachel A.; Wang, Michelle; Benitez, Josie; Ocampo, John Daryl – Journal of Cognition and Development, 2020
This article introduces an accessible approach to implementing unmoderated remote research in developmental science -- research in which children and families participate in studies remotely and independently, without directly interacting with researchers. Unmoderated remote research has the potential to strengthen developmental science by: (1)…
Descriptors: Research, Cognitive Development, Children, Family (Sociological Unit)
Dooly, Melinda; Moore, Emilee; Vallejo, Claudia – Research-publishing.net, 2017
Qualitative research, especially studies in educational contexts, often brings up questions of ethics because the study design involves human subjects, some of whom are under age (e.g. data collected in primary education classrooms). It is not always easy for young researchers to anticipate where ethical issues might emerge while designing their…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Ethics, Guidelines, Informed Consent
Locke, Terry; Alcorn, Noeline; O'Neill, John – Educational Action Research, 2013
This article begins by raising issues around the way in which ethical approval for research is managed in university settings, where committees often base their assumptions on a principlist approach making a number of assumptions that we consider to be contestable, such as a neat separation between researcher and researched. However, collaborative…
Descriptors: Action Research, Ethics, Researchers, Research Administration