Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Natural Language Processing | 5 |
Scoring | 5 |
Automation | 3 |
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
Language Tests | 2 |
Test Construction | 2 |
Writing Evaluation | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Best Practices | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Allen, Laura K. | 1 |
Arthur C. Grasser | 1 |
Crossley, Scott A. | 1 |
Danielle S. McNamara | 1 |
Enright, Mary K. | 1 |
Kim, Minkyung | 1 |
Laura K. Allen | 1 |
McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
Quinlan, Thomas | 1 |
Rotou, Ourania | 1 |
Rupp, André A. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Laura K. Allen; Arthur C. Grasser; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2023
Assessments of natural language can provide vast information about individuals' thoughts and cognitive process, but they often rely on time-intensive human scoring, deterring researchers from collecting these sources of data. Natural language processing (NLP) gives researchers the opportunity to implement automated textual analyses across a…
Descriptors: Psychological Studies, Natural Language Processing, Automation, Research Methodology
Crossley, Scott A.; Kim, Minkyung; Allen, Laura K.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2019
Summarization is an effective strategy to promote and enhance learning and deep comprehension of texts. However, summarization is seldom implemented by teachers in classrooms because the manual evaluation of students' summaries requires time and effort. This problem has led to the development of automated models of summarization quality. However,…
Descriptors: Automation, Writing Evaluation, Natural Language Processing, Artificial Intelligence
Advancing Language Assessment with AI and ML--Leaning into AI Is Inevitable, but Can Theory Keep Up?
Xiaoming Xi – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2023
Following the burgeoning growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications in language assessment in recent years, the meteoric rise of ChatGPT and its sweeping applications in almost every sector have left us in awe, scrambling to catch up by developing theories and best practices. This special issue features studies…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Theory Practice Relationship, Language Tests, Man Machine Systems
Rotou, Ourania; Rupp, André A. – ETS Research Report Series, 2020
This research report provides a description of the processes of evaluating the "deployability" of automated scoring (AS) systems from the perspective of large-scale educational assessments in operational settings. It discusses a comprehensive psychometric evaluation that entails analyses that take into consideration the specific purpose…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Educational Assessment, Psychometrics
Enright, Mary K.; Quinlan, Thomas – Language Testing, 2010
E-rater[R] is an automated essay scoring system that uses natural language processing techniques to extract features from essays and to model statistically human holistic ratings. Educational Testing Service has investigated the use of e-rater, in conjunction with human ratings, to score one of the two writing tasks on the TOEFL-iBT[R] writing…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Scoring, Essays, Language Processing