Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Questionnaires | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Engineering | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| South Africa | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Inventory of Learning… | 2 |
| Approaches to Studying… | 1 |
| Eysenck Personality Inventory | 1 |
| Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 1 |
| Study Process Questionnaire | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMogashana, Disaapele; Case, Jennifer M.; Marshall, Delia – Studies in Higher Education, 2012
Student learning inventories are used by both researchers and educators as tools to identify "at risk" students. This article critically interrogates the results of one of these inventories, the 18-item Approaches to Learning and Studying Inventory. In-depth interviews were held with a purposive sample of 10 first-year engineering…
Descriptors: Criticism, College Students, Student Reaction, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewedBeyler, Jane; Schmeck, Ronald Ray – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992
The construct validity of the holistic-analytic continuum in information processing strategies was generally supported by an evaluation of the following instruments: (1) the Inventory of Learning Processes; (2) the Human Information Processing Survey; (3) the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator; and (4) the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Subjects were…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Construct Validity, Higher Education
