Descriptor
Census Figures | 2 |
Court Litigation | 2 |
Ethnic Groups | 2 |
Hispanic Americans | 2 |
Human Geography | 2 |
Minority Groups | 2 |
Political Attitudes | 2 |
Racial Discrimination | 2 |
Voting Rights | 2 |
Blacks | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Evaluation Review | 2 |
Author
Freedman, David A. | 2 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Freedman, David A.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1991
Advocates of the use of ecological regression as an indicator of ethnic voting behavior have not demonstrated its validity. The neighborhood model, which assumes that within each precinct Hispanic Americans and non-Hispanic Americans vote alike, is supported as a better way to draw conclusions about voting behavior. (SLD)
Descriptors: Census Figures, Court Litigation, Ethnic Groups, Hispanic Americans

Freedman, David A.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1991
The use of ecological regression in voting rights cases is discussed in the context of a lawsuit against Los Angeles County (California) in 1990. Ecological regression assumes that systematic voting differences between precincts are explained by ethnic differences. An alternative neighborhood model is shown to lead to different conclusions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Blacks, Census Figures, Comparative Analysis, Court Litigation